Validation of Risk Stratification Methods for Congenital Heart Disease Surgery in Mexico: RACHS-1 and Aristotle Scales

Luis Manuel Zúñiga-Alanís, Alberto Ramírez Castañeda, M. Peralta, G. B. Sánchez, E. Almeida-Gutiérrez, Adriana Pérez Rubio, Sesbania Bocanegra Flores, Edgar Hernández Rendón, D. R. Morales, H. M. González, Lucelli Yáñez Gutiérrez, Diana López Gallegos, Alejandro Jiménez Hernández, L. M. Concebida, Jesús Hernández Tizcareño, Alpha Larissa Nava Oliva, Javier Figueroa Solano, L. Fernández, Carmen Yandira Vianna Da-Silva Rodriguez, L. Costabile, Sebastian Izunza Saldaña, Antonio Barragan Zamora, Cecilio Cruz Gaona, Carlos Riera Kinkel
{"title":"Validation of Risk Stratification Methods for Congenital Heart Disease Surgery in Mexico: RACHS-1 and Aristotle Scales","authors":"Luis Manuel Zúñiga-Alanís, Alberto Ramírez Castañeda, M. Peralta, G. B. Sánchez, E. Almeida-Gutiérrez, Adriana Pérez Rubio, Sesbania Bocanegra Flores, Edgar Hernández Rendón, D. R. Morales, H. M. González, Lucelli Yáñez Gutiérrez, Diana López Gallegos, Alejandro Jiménez Hernández, L. M. Concebida, Jesús Hernández Tizcareño, Alpha Larissa Nava Oliva, Javier Figueroa Solano, L. Fernández, Carmen Yandira Vianna Da-Silva Rodriguez, L. Costabile, Sebastian Izunza Saldaña, Antonio Barragan Zamora, Cecilio Cruz Gaona, Carlos Riera Kinkel","doi":"10.15226/2573-864x/4/1/00152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Currently, it has two methods of risk stratification in Congenital Heart surgery: Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery(RACHS-1) and the complex integral Aristotelian (Aristotle). Although they have been tested in different countries, they have not been validated in hospitals of Mexico. Objectives: Validating both methods at 3rd Level Hospital (Cardiology Hospital CMN-SXXI, IMSS, Mexico City) for patients submitted to cardiac surgery due to congenital heart defects, between January 2015 and December 2016. Methods: A retrospective study of patients in the Hospital’s cardiology of the National Medical Center C-XXI, IMSS-Mexico, of any age and gender undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease elective or emergency with clinical record is prepared full. For studying validity, internal consistency, calibration, capacity for discrimination and morbidity and mortality between the risk levels were analyzed. Results: We included 201 patients with complete data. Both study scales in our study were statistically significant in the Logistic regression analysis (p = 0.001 and p = 0.000, respectively). Calibration test show to be non-significant for both scales (X2 of Hosmer-Lemeshow of 0.357 and 3.235 respectively). The areas under the ROC curve were 0.770 and 0.806, respectively, suggesting a good discrimination. The observed mortality was (6.46%). Nevertheless, each segment of the scales exceeded the expected in mortality according to the internationally accepted parameters for RACHS-1. Conclusion: We conclude that it is valid to use RACHS-1 and basic Aristotle for surgery of congenital heart disease, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.740. We suggested developing mechanisms to understand those variables that come out of the control of these instruments, such as the patient’s low weight and a history of reoperation. Key words: surgical risk; congenital heart disease; RACHS-1; Aristotle","PeriodicalId":362247,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15226/2573-864x/4/1/00152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, it has two methods of risk stratification in Congenital Heart surgery: Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery(RACHS-1) and the complex integral Aristotelian (Aristotle). Although they have been tested in different countries, they have not been validated in hospitals of Mexico. Objectives: Validating both methods at 3rd Level Hospital (Cardiology Hospital CMN-SXXI, IMSS, Mexico City) for patients submitted to cardiac surgery due to congenital heart defects, between January 2015 and December 2016. Methods: A retrospective study of patients in the Hospital’s cardiology of the National Medical Center C-XXI, IMSS-Mexico, of any age and gender undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease elective or emergency with clinical record is prepared full. For studying validity, internal consistency, calibration, capacity for discrimination and morbidity and mortality between the risk levels were analyzed. Results: We included 201 patients with complete data. Both study scales in our study were statistically significant in the Logistic regression analysis (p = 0.001 and p = 0.000, respectively). Calibration test show to be non-significant for both scales (X2 of Hosmer-Lemeshow of 0.357 and 3.235 respectively). The areas under the ROC curve were 0.770 and 0.806, respectively, suggesting a good discrimination. The observed mortality was (6.46%). Nevertheless, each segment of the scales exceeded the expected in mortality according to the internationally accepted parameters for RACHS-1. Conclusion: We conclude that it is valid to use RACHS-1 and basic Aristotle for surgery of congenital heart disease, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.740. We suggested developing mechanisms to understand those variables that come out of the control of these instruments, such as the patient’s low weight and a history of reoperation. Key words: surgical risk; congenital heart disease; RACHS-1; Aristotle
墨西哥先天性心脏病手术风险分层方法的验证:RACHS-1和亚里士多德量表
背景:目前,先天性心脏手术风险分层有两种方法:先天性心脏手术风险调整法(RACHS-1)和复积分亚里士多德法(Aristotle)。虽然它们已经在不同的国家进行了测试,但它们尚未在墨西哥的医院得到验证。目的:在2015年1月至2016年12月期间,在三级医院(墨西哥城IMSS心脏病医院CMN-SXXI)对因先天性心脏缺陷进行心脏手术的患者验证这两种方法。方法:对IMSS-Mexico国家医学中心C-XXI医院心脏病学患者进行回顾性研究,无论年龄和性别,均可选择或急诊接受先天性心脏病手术,并有完整的临床记录。为了研究效度,分析了风险水平之间的内部一致性、校准、区分能力和发病率和死亡率。结果:纳入201例患者,资料完整。本研究的两个研究量表在Logistic回归分析中均具有统计学意义(p = 0.001和p = 0.000)。两种量表的校正检验均不显著(Hosmer-Lemeshow的X2分别为0.357和3.235)。ROC曲线下面积分别为0.770和0.806,判别性较好。观察死亡率为6.46%。然而,根据国际公认的RACHS-1参数,每个比额表段的死亡率都超过了预期。结论:我们认为RACHS-1和基本亚里士多德用于先天性心脏病手术是有效的,Cronbach’s alpha为0.740。我们建议建立机制来了解这些器械控制之外的变量,例如患者的低体重和再手术史。关键词:手术风险;先天性心脏病;RACHS-1;亚里士多德
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信