{"title":"Judges in Hades from Homer to Plato","authors":"A. Bernabé","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1qp9gc9.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 8 explores the origins of the concept of post-mortem judgement in the Greek world, which Benarbé argues attains a position of prominence originally in the dialogues of Plato. Although not without precedent entirely in the earlier literary tradition, and continually presented as a traditional idea by Socrates himself, Benarbé demonstrates that references to post-mortem judgement before Plato are infrequent, inconsistent, and inconspicuous. Benarbé provides considerable illumination to this topic through firstly collating the fragmentary claims concerning post-mortem judgement before Plato, secondly noting the different, and often conflicting ways in which such material is deployed throughout the dialogues; and thirdly demonstrating how the theme is adapted to suit the dialectic requirements of the particular dialogues.","PeriodicalId":380968,"journal":{"name":"Aspects of Death and the Afterlife in Greek Literature","volume":"2601 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aspects of Death and the Afterlife in Greek Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1qp9gc9.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chapter 8 explores the origins of the concept of post-mortem judgement in the Greek world, which Benarbé argues attains a position of prominence originally in the dialogues of Plato. Although not without precedent entirely in the earlier literary tradition, and continually presented as a traditional idea by Socrates himself, Benarbé demonstrates that references to post-mortem judgement before Plato are infrequent, inconsistent, and inconspicuous. Benarbé provides considerable illumination to this topic through firstly collating the fragmentary claims concerning post-mortem judgement before Plato, secondly noting the different, and often conflicting ways in which such material is deployed throughout the dialogues; and thirdly demonstrating how the theme is adapted to suit the dialectic requirements of the particular dialogues.