{"title":"Importing mental patterns of coherence as a comprehension strategy: a case study of errors in reference assignment","authors":"Pilar Alonso","doi":"10.36505/exling-2010/03/0003/000123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the interface between structural coherence, which builds on the formal and conceptual conventions of discourse, and cognitive coherence, which develops around the internal and external aspects of communication (Pasquier and Chaib-draa 2005). More specifically, the focus is on the cognitive coherence strategies set forth by discourse receivers when they encounter comprehension problems, especially those caused by non-standard uses in structural coherence. Drawing from studies on coherence and comprehension (Giora 1997; Wilson and Matsui 2000; Hobbs 2004), the paper discusses a case study which shows how error in reference assignment may encourage readers to import mental patterns of coherence, external to the discourse, as a repair strategy, thus prioritizing structural adjacency and their search for relevance over comprehension.","PeriodicalId":447857,"journal":{"name":"ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics","volume":"10 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36505/exling-2010/03/0003/000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper addresses the interface between structural coherence, which builds on the formal and conceptual conventions of discourse, and cognitive coherence, which develops around the internal and external aspects of communication (Pasquier and Chaib-draa 2005). More specifically, the focus is on the cognitive coherence strategies set forth by discourse receivers when they encounter comprehension problems, especially those caused by non-standard uses in structural coherence. Drawing from studies on coherence and comprehension (Giora 1997; Wilson and Matsui 2000; Hobbs 2004), the paper discusses a case study which shows how error in reference assignment may encourage readers to import mental patterns of coherence, external to the discourse, as a repair strategy, thus prioritizing structural adjacency and their search for relevance over comprehension.
本文探讨了结构连贯和认知连贯之间的界面,结构连贯建立在话语的形式和概念惯例之上,认知连贯则围绕着交际的内部和外部方面发展(Pasquier and Chaib-draa 2005)。更具体地说,重点是话语接受者在遇到理解问题时所采取的认知连贯策略,特别是在结构连贯中不标准的用法所造成的理解问题。借鉴连贯性和理解的研究(Giora 1997;Wilson and Matsui 2000;霍布斯(Hobbs, 2004),本文讨论了一个案例研究,该案例研究表明,参考文献分配中的错误可能会鼓励读者将连贯的心理模式引入话语外部,作为一种修复策略,从而优先考虑结构邻接和他们对相关性的寻求,而不是理解。