CRIMINAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF CORPORATIONS IN THE CRIME OF MONEY LAUNDERING IN INDONESIA

Achmad Khozin Baharudin, A. Kartika
{"title":"CRIMINAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF CORPORATIONS IN THE CRIME OF MONEY LAUNDERING IN INDONESIA","authors":"Achmad Khozin Baharudin, A. Kartika","doi":"10.30863/aldustur.v6i1.4684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of economic globalization in a country requires a role and strengthening in order to synergize commitments through predetermined steps to harmonize economic stability and is expected to be able to face the country's economic crisis. Beneficial Ownership (BO) has the opportunity to commit a criminal act of money laundering through nominee mode so that the original identity is not known by placing dirty assets in the form of shares in the corporation so that the corporation acts as a vehicle for the crime. This research is conducted through the normative juridical method. Research using library materials by examining a legal regulation, doctrine from experts, or theories that intersect with the subject matter of discussion. The results showed that the form of responsibility looks at who is related to money laundering. The theory of corporate liability is included in limited liability. In principle, limited liability is intended for legal subjects in corporations that commit criminal acts regardless of the mistakes made but meet the elements of the Article in criminal law. Because the position of beneficial ownership is not yet effective and is still gray in the corporation, in beneficial ownership criminal liability uses strict liability, which is the punishment of criminals on the condition of considering the criminal acts committed with the rules of criminal imposition (legality) without seeing the inner attitude of the perpetrator.","PeriodicalId":446442,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Al-Dustur","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Al-Dustur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30863/aldustur.v6i1.4684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The development of economic globalization in a country requires a role and strengthening in order to synergize commitments through predetermined steps to harmonize economic stability and is expected to be able to face the country's economic crisis. Beneficial Ownership (BO) has the opportunity to commit a criminal act of money laundering through nominee mode so that the original identity is not known by placing dirty assets in the form of shares in the corporation so that the corporation acts as a vehicle for the crime. This research is conducted through the normative juridical method. Research using library materials by examining a legal regulation, doctrine from experts, or theories that intersect with the subject matter of discussion. The results showed that the form of responsibility looks at who is related to money laundering. The theory of corporate liability is included in limited liability. In principle, limited liability is intended for legal subjects in corporations that commit criminal acts regardless of the mistakes made but meet the elements of the Article in criminal law. Because the position of beneficial ownership is not yet effective and is still gray in the corporation, in beneficial ownership criminal liability uses strict liability, which is the punishment of criminals on the condition of considering the criminal acts committed with the rules of criminal imposition (legality) without seeing the inner attitude of the perpetrator.
印尼洗钱犯罪中公司受益所有人的刑事问责
经济全球化的发展需要一个国家的作用和加强,以协同承诺,通过预定的步骤,协调经济稳定和预期能够面对该国的经济危机。受益所有人(BO)有机会通过代名模式实施洗钱犯罪行为,通过将肮脏资产以公司股份的形式放置在公司中,使公司成为犯罪的工具,从而使原始身份不为人所知。本研究是通过规范的法学方法进行的。利用图书馆资料进行研究,通过研究与讨论主题相关的法律规定、专家的学说或理论。结果表明,责任的形式看谁与洗钱有关。公司责任理论包含在有限责任中。原则上,有限责任适用于法人主体,无论犯了什么错误,只要符合刑法第1条的要件,就实施了犯罪行为。由于受益所有人在公司中的地位尚未生效,处于灰色状态,因此受益所有人的刑事责任采用严格责任,即在不考虑行为人内心态度的情况下,以刑事强制(合法性)规则来考虑犯罪行为的情况下对犯罪分子的惩罚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信