The Comparison and Reform of the Way of Providing for the Aged in China and South Korea

Xiaoyan Qi
{"title":"The Comparison and Reform of the Way of Providing for the Aged in China and South Korea","authors":"Xiaoyan Qi","doi":"10.38007/ijssem.2023.040106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The pension issue has been widely concerned in China and South Korea. The purpose of this study is to compare the way of providing for the elderly in China and South Korea and explore its transformation, so as to provide enlightenment for the policy and practice of providing for the aged. Using a literature review method, this study collects and analyzes academic research, policy documents, and empirical data on elderly care styles in China and South Korea. By comparing the differences in the old-age care models, family relationships, old-age care institutions, and old-age care services between the two countries, this paper discussed the reform measures and trends in the two countries' old-age care methods, and summarized the commonalities and differences in the way of supporting the elderly in China and South Korea. Family relations are very important in the pension model of both countries, but China's traditional family pension model is facing challenges, while South Korea focuses on the development of pension institutions and community pension services. The Chinese government is improving its community elderly care services. The South Korean government improves the pension methods by providing diversified pension services and adopting innovative technologies, and is committed to promoting the reform of pension methods.","PeriodicalId":131969,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Management","volume":"291 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38007/ijssem.2023.040106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The pension issue has been widely concerned in China and South Korea. The purpose of this study is to compare the way of providing for the elderly in China and South Korea and explore its transformation, so as to provide enlightenment for the policy and practice of providing for the aged. Using a literature review method, this study collects and analyzes academic research, policy documents, and empirical data on elderly care styles in China and South Korea. By comparing the differences in the old-age care models, family relationships, old-age care institutions, and old-age care services between the two countries, this paper discussed the reform measures and trends in the two countries' old-age care methods, and summarized the commonalities and differences in the way of supporting the elderly in China and South Korea. Family relations are very important in the pension model of both countries, but China's traditional family pension model is facing challenges, while South Korea focuses on the development of pension institutions and community pension services. The Chinese government is improving its community elderly care services. The South Korean government improves the pension methods by providing diversified pension services and adopting innovative technologies, and is committed to promoting the reform of pension methods.
中国与韩国养老方式的比较与改革
养老金问题在中国和韩国受到广泛关注。本研究的目的是比较中韩两国的养老方式并探讨其转型,从而为养老政策和实践提供启示。本研究采用文献综述法,收集并分析了中韩两国有关养老方式的学术研究、政策文件和实证数据。本文通过比较两国在养老模式、家庭关系、养老机构、养老服务等方面的差异,探讨两国养老方式的改革措施和发展趋势,总结出中韩两国养老方式的共性和差异。家庭关系在两国养老模式中都非常重要,但中国传统的家庭养老模式面临挑战,而韩国则注重养老机构和社区养老服务的发展。中国政府正在改善社区养老服务。韩国政府通过提供多样化的养老服务和采用创新技术来改善养老方式,并致力于推动养老方式的改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信