La antropología spinoziana frente a la antropología cartesiana

Revista de Filosofía Laguna Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.25145/j.laguna.2019.45.03

Daniel Moreno Moreno, Ies Miguel Servet

{"title":"La antropología spinoziana frente a la antropología cartesiana","authors":"Daniel Moreno Moreno, Ies Miguel Servet","doi":"10.25145/j.laguna.2019.45.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEn el articulo se ponen frente a frente la antropologia cartesiana –especialmente Les passsions de l’âme (1649)– y la antropologia spinoziana expuesta en el manuscrito llamado Korte Verhandeling y en su Ethica (1677). Se comprueba la clara influencia de Descartes sobre Spinoza, pero se constata tambien la diferencia de fondo: el enfoque cartesiano es medico, psicologico y fisiologico mientras que el de Spinoza es teologico, logico y moralista. Se ofrece ademas una nueva interpretacion del famoso pasaje de la Etica donde Spinoza critica, no sin ironia, expresamente a su maestro Descartes. EnglishThis paper confronts Descartes’ anthropology –particularly Les passsions de l’âme (1649)– and the anthropology that Spinoza expounds in his manuscript Korte Verhandeling and in his Ethica (1677). The great influence of Descartes upon Spinoza is detected, but their differences are discussed too: Cartesian views are medical, psychological and physiological; Spinozian views are theological, logical and moral. The paper focuses on the famous fragment of Ethics, where Spinoza quotes Descartes in order to criticize him, with a little irony.","PeriodicalId":364417,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Filosofía Laguna","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Filosofía Laguna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25145/j.laguna.2019.45.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

espanolEn el articulo se ponen frente a frente la antropologia cartesiana –especialmente Les passsions de l’âme (1649)– y la antropologia spinoziana expuesta en el manuscrito llamado Korte Verhandeling y en su Ethica (1677). Se comprueba la clara influencia de Descartes sobre Spinoza, pero se constata tambien la diferencia de fondo: el enfoque cartesiano es medico, psicologico y fisiologico mientras que el de Spinoza es teologico, logico y moralista. Se ofrece ademas una nueva interpretacion del famoso pasaje de la Etica donde Spinoza critica, no sin ironia, expresamente a su maestro Descartes. EnglishThis paper confronts Descartes’ anthropology –particularly Les passsions de l’âme (1649)– and the anthropology that Spinoza expounds in his manuscript Korte Verhandeling and in his Ethica (1677). The great influence of Descartes upon Spinoza is detected, but their differences are discussed too: Cartesian views are medical, psychological and physiological; Spinozian views are theological, logical and moral. The paper focuses on the famous fragment of Ethics, where Spinoza quotes Descartes in order to criticize him, with a little irony.

查看原文本刊更多论文

斯宾诺莎人类学与笛卡尔人类学

这篇文章将笛卡尔人类学——尤其是《激情》(1649)——与斯宾诺莎的人类学进行了对比，斯宾诺莎的人类学在《Korte Verhandeling》手稿和他的《伦理学》(1677)中进行了阐述。在这篇文章中，我们发现了笛卡尔对斯宾诺莎的明显影响，但也发现了根本的不同:笛卡尔的方法是医学的、心理的和生理学的，而斯宾诺莎的方法是神学的、逻辑学的和道德的。它还提供了一个新的解释，著名的伦理学段落，斯宾诺莎批评，并非没有讽刺，明确地，笛卡尔。这篇论文比较了笛卡尔的人类学——尤其是《激情》(1649)——和斯宾诺莎在他的手稿《Korte Verhandeling》和他的伦理学(1677)中阐述的人类学。The great影响笛卡尔upon鲁赫is detected也会上讨论的,但他们的差异是:Cartesian医疗、心理和physiological有意见;= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，这个县的总面积为，其中土地和(3.064平方公里)水。The paper的on The cedefop fragment of Ethics,遂宁市鲁赫quotes笛卡尔in order to criticize, with a little irony。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Revista de Filosofía Laguna

自引率

0.00%

发文量