Literary Justice: The Participatory Ethics of Early Modern Possible Worlds

D. Sarkar
{"title":"Literary Justice: The Participatory Ethics of Early Modern Possible Worlds","authors":"D. Sarkar","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474455589.003.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Where early modern writers traffic in imaginative inventions, they often do so with the aim of effecting positive change. In this chapter, Debapriya Sarkar puts pressure on the ethical relation between literature’s celebration of possible worlds and the pedagogical value of such imagined realms for the reader—and, by extension, for the student of early modern literature and culture. She shows how we might tap into the ubiquitous presence of imaginary worlds in early modern literature; these “golden” worlds of the imagination simultaneously practice and theorize ways of knowing and being in the actual world. What Sarkar calls “participatory readerly ethics” reveals “the radical potential of poiesis” to help us transform what is into what might be.","PeriodicalId":186553,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Social Justice Through Shakespeare","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Social Justice Through Shakespeare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474455589.003.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Where early modern writers traffic in imaginative inventions, they often do so with the aim of effecting positive change. In this chapter, Debapriya Sarkar puts pressure on the ethical relation between literature’s celebration of possible worlds and the pedagogical value of such imagined realms for the reader—and, by extension, for the student of early modern literature and culture. She shows how we might tap into the ubiquitous presence of imaginary worlds in early modern literature; these “golden” worlds of the imagination simultaneously practice and theorize ways of knowing and being in the actual world. What Sarkar calls “participatory readerly ethics” reveals “the radical potential of poiesis” to help us transform what is into what might be.
文学正义:早期现代可能世界的参与伦理
早期现代作家在创作富有想象力的发明时,往往是为了产生积极的变化。在这一章中,Debapriya Sarkar对文学对可能世界的庆祝与这种想象领域对读者的教育价值之间的伦理关系施加了压力,并引申为早期现代文学和文化的学生。她向我们展示了如何利用早期现代文学中无处不在的想象世界;这些想象的“金色”世界同时实践和理论化了认识和存在于现实世界中的方式。萨卡尔所说的“参与式读者伦理”揭示了“政治的激进潜力”,可以帮助我们将现状转变为可能的状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信