Programmatic Involvement and Emerging Educational Outcomes: An Exploratory Study

A. McKim, R. McKendree
{"title":"Programmatic Involvement and Emerging Educational Outcomes: An Exploratory Study","authors":"A. McKim, R. McKendree","doi":"10.5328/CTER45.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preparing students in school-based agricultural education (SBAE) to respond to emerging challenges impacting - and being impacted by - agriculture, food, and natural resource systems (e.g., climate change, water scarcity, soil degradation) is essential. Therefore, student involvement in SBAE was investigated in relation to metacognition, problem-solving abilities, and systems thinking, three educational outcomes deemed 'emerging' due to their necessity in addressing complex problems. Overall, results from this investigation suggest involvement in SBAE is related to higher levels of metacognition, problem-solving ability, and systems thinking when compared to no involvement. However, when comparing more advanced levels of involvement (e.g., participating in state or national level [Future Farmers of America] FFA contests) to foundational involvement (e.g., participating in local/chapter level FFA contests), advanced involvement did not consistently relate to increased attainment of the emerging educational outcomes. In congruence with the Theory of Student Involvement, recommendations for practice and research are highlighted. Principal among the recommendations is a call for educators to invest resources to encourage a broader range of students to be involved in SBAE at more foundational levels rather than investing resources in the advanced involvement of a select few students.","PeriodicalId":356207,"journal":{"name":"Career and Technical Education Research","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Career and Technical Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5328/CTER45.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preparing students in school-based agricultural education (SBAE) to respond to emerging challenges impacting - and being impacted by - agriculture, food, and natural resource systems (e.g., climate change, water scarcity, soil degradation) is essential. Therefore, student involvement in SBAE was investigated in relation to metacognition, problem-solving abilities, and systems thinking, three educational outcomes deemed 'emerging' due to their necessity in addressing complex problems. Overall, results from this investigation suggest involvement in SBAE is related to higher levels of metacognition, problem-solving ability, and systems thinking when compared to no involvement. However, when comparing more advanced levels of involvement (e.g., participating in state or national level [Future Farmers of America] FFA contests) to foundational involvement (e.g., participating in local/chapter level FFA contests), advanced involvement did not consistently relate to increased attainment of the emerging educational outcomes. In congruence with the Theory of Student Involvement, recommendations for practice and research are highlighted. Principal among the recommendations is a call for educators to invest resources to encourage a broader range of students to be involved in SBAE at more foundational levels rather than investing resources in the advanced involvement of a select few students.
项目参与与新兴教育成果:一项探索性研究
让学生在校本农业教育(SBAE)中做好准备,以应对影响农业、粮食和自然资源系统(如气候变化、水资源短缺、土壤退化)的新挑战,并受到这些挑战的影响,这一点至关重要。因此,我们调查了学生参与SBAE与元认知、解决问题能力和系统思维的关系,这三种教育成果被认为是“新兴的”,因为它们在解决复杂问题方面是必要的。总的来说,这项调查的结果表明,与没有参与相比,参与SBAE与更高水平的元认知、解决问题的能力和系统思维有关。然而,当比较更高层次的参与(例如,参加州或国家级[美国未来农民]FFA比赛)与基础参与(例如,参加地方/分会级FFA比赛)时,高级参与并不总是与新兴教育成果的提高有关。与学生参与理论相一致,强调了对实践和研究的建议。其中最主要的建议是呼吁教育工作者投入资源,鼓励更广泛的学生在更基础的水平上参与SBAE,而不是在少数学生的高级参与上投入资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信