Integrated Analysis of Cache Related Preemption Delays and Cache Persistence Reload Overheads

Syed Aftab Rashid, Geoffrey Nelissen, S. Altmeyer, Robert I. Davis, E. Tovar
{"title":"Integrated Analysis of Cache Related Preemption Delays and Cache Persistence Reload Overheads","authors":"Syed Aftab Rashid, Geoffrey Nelissen, S. Altmeyer, Robert I. Davis, E. Tovar","doi":"10.1109/RTSS.2017.00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Schedulability analysis for tasks running on micro- processors with cache memory is incomplete without a treatment of Cache Related Preemption Delays (CRPD) and Cache Persistence Reload Overheads (CPRO). State-of-the-art analyses compute CRPD and CPRO independently, which might result in counting the same overhead more than once. In this paper, we analyze the pessimism associated with the independent calculation of CRPD and CPRO in comparison to an integrated approach. We answer two main questions: (1) Is it benecial to integrate the calculation of CRPD and CPRO? (2) When and to what extent can we gain in terms of schedulability by integrating the calculation of CRPD and CPRO? To achieve this, we (i) identify situations where considering CRPD and CPRO separately might result in overestimating the total memory overhead suffered by tasks, (ii) derive new analyses that integrate the calculation of CRPD and CPRO; and (iii) perform a thorough experimental evaluation using benchmarks to compare the performance of the integrated analysis against the separate calculation of CRPD and CPRO.","PeriodicalId":407932,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTSS.2017.00025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Schedulability analysis for tasks running on micro- processors with cache memory is incomplete without a treatment of Cache Related Preemption Delays (CRPD) and Cache Persistence Reload Overheads (CPRO). State-of-the-art analyses compute CRPD and CPRO independently, which might result in counting the same overhead more than once. In this paper, we analyze the pessimism associated with the independent calculation of CRPD and CPRO in comparison to an integrated approach. We answer two main questions: (1) Is it benecial to integrate the calculation of CRPD and CPRO? (2) When and to what extent can we gain in terms of schedulability by integrating the calculation of CRPD and CPRO? To achieve this, we (i) identify situations where considering CRPD and CPRO separately might result in overestimating the total memory overhead suffered by tasks, (ii) derive new analyses that integrate the calculation of CRPD and CPRO; and (iii) perform a thorough experimental evaluation using benchmarks to compare the performance of the integrated analysis against the separate calculation of CRPD and CPRO.
缓存相关抢占延迟和缓存持久化重载开销的综合分析
如果没有缓存相关抢占延迟(CRPD)和缓存持久化重载开销(CPRO)的处理,在带有缓存的微处理器上运行的任务的可调度性分析是不完整的。最先进的分析独立计算CRPD和CPRO,这可能导致多次计算相同的开销。在本文中,我们分析了与综合方法相比,独立计算CRPD和CPRO所带来的悲观情绪。我们回答了两个主要问题:(1)整合CRPD和CPRO的计算是否有益?(2)整合CRPD和CPRO的计算,在可调度性方面何时以及在多大程度上可以获益?为了实现这一目标,我们(i)确定单独考虑CRPD和CPRO可能导致高估任务所遭受的总内存开销的情况,(ii)推导出整合CRPD和CPRO计算的新分析;(iii)使用基准进行彻底的实验评估,将综合分析的性能与单独计算的CRPD和CPRO进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信