{"title":"Earthen Lavers","authors":"E. Lavers, Tyler Chadwick","doi":"10.5406/15549399.56.1.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A few years ago, William Logan wrote, “Poetry has long been a major art with a minor audience.” We could more accurately call it a major art with many minor audiences grouped, like the poets, around region, identity, ideology, and artistic affiliations—a fragmentation that makes generalizations difficult. It is not easy to place in a larger context the three books I am reviewing here—Tyler Chadwick’s Litany with Wings, Scott Hales’s Hemingway in Paradise and Other Poems, and Elizabeth Pinborough’s The Brain’s Lectionary. The collection most explicitly tied to Mormon culture is Hemingway in Paradise. But suppose “Afterlives” were called “The Modern Purgatorio”? Or “Primary Activity” became “Vacation Bible School”? They would work about as well. Litany with Wings and The Brain’s Lectionary have affiliations with feminism’s goddess poetry, and both borrow heavily from the liturgical language of Catholicism, though probably in ways that suggest their non-Catholic origin. Poetry by neurodivergent poets has recently received increased attention; The Brain’s Lectionary is a brilliant example and deserves to find an audience beyond LDS circles.","PeriodicalId":121099,"journal":{"name":"Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/15549399.56.1.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A few years ago, William Logan wrote, “Poetry has long been a major art with a minor audience.” We could more accurately call it a major art with many minor audiences grouped, like the poets, around region, identity, ideology, and artistic affiliations—a fragmentation that makes generalizations difficult. It is not easy to place in a larger context the three books I am reviewing here—Tyler Chadwick’s Litany with Wings, Scott Hales’s Hemingway in Paradise and Other Poems, and Elizabeth Pinborough’s The Brain’s Lectionary. The collection most explicitly tied to Mormon culture is Hemingway in Paradise. But suppose “Afterlives” were called “The Modern Purgatorio”? Or “Primary Activity” became “Vacation Bible School”? They would work about as well. Litany with Wings and The Brain’s Lectionary have affiliations with feminism’s goddess poetry, and both borrow heavily from the liturgical language of Catholicism, though probably in ways that suggest their non-Catholic origin. Poetry by neurodivergent poets has recently received increased attention; The Brain’s Lectionary is a brilliant example and deserves to find an audience beyond LDS circles.
几年前,威廉·洛根(William Logan)写道:“长期以来,诗歌一直是一门受众较少的主流艺术。”我们可以更准确地称它为一门主要的艺术,它有许多次要的观众,就像诗人一样,围绕着地域、身份、意识形态和艺术归属——这种分裂使得概括起来很困难。要把我在这里评论的三本书——泰勒·查德威克的《带着翅膀的连祷文》、斯科特·黑尔斯的《天堂中的海明威及其他诗歌》和伊丽莎白·平伯勒的《大脑的选集》——放在一个更大的背景中并不容易。与摩门教文化联系最密切的是《海明威在天堂》(Hemingway in Paradise)。但假如《来世》被称为《现代炼狱》呢?或者“小学活动”变成了“假日圣经学校”?他们也会工作。《长翅膀的祷文》和《大脑的选集》都与女权主义的女神诗歌有联系,两者都大量借用了天主教的礼拜语言,尽管可能以某种方式表明它们的非天主教起源。神经发散诗人的诗歌最近受到越来越多的关注;《Brain’s Lectionary》就是一个很好的例子,值得在LDS圈子之外找到受众。