{"title":"‘Congiure contro a uno principe’","authors":"Marta Celati","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198863625.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The final chapter examines the relationship between Machiavelli’s work and fifteenth-century literature on conspiracies. The analysis highlights the role that this humanist literature played in the development of Machiavelli’s complex theorization of conspiracies as a political phenomenon, but it also underlines how, although he was influenced by this background, he also radically departed from it. Machiavelli dealt with this political subject in several sections of his works: in particular in his long chapter Delle congiure in the Discorsi (III, 6), which can be considered a comprehensive treatise on plots; in chapter XIX of Il principe; and in some significant chapters of the Istorie fiorentine, where Machiavelli narrates the conspiracies that took place in Italy in the previous centuries. He was the first author to develop a substantial theorization of political plots and he based it on concrete historical examples drawn from previous narratives and from ancient history. Machiavelli’s analysis of conspiracies shares some key elements with the political perspective underlying fifteenth-century literature on plots: his focus on the figure of the prince as the main target of the conspiracy; the importance assigned to the role of the common people and to the issue of building political consensus; the attention paid to internal enemies and internal matters within the state, rather than to the relationship with foreign political forces; the evolution in the analytical approach regarding tyranny and tyrannicide; the centrality of the notion of crimen laesae maiestatis; the emphasis on the negative political outcome of plots.","PeriodicalId":270500,"journal":{"name":"Conspiracy Literature in Early Renaissance Italy","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conspiracy Literature in Early Renaissance Italy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198863625.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The final chapter examines the relationship between Machiavelli’s work and fifteenth-century literature on conspiracies. The analysis highlights the role that this humanist literature played in the development of Machiavelli’s complex theorization of conspiracies as a political phenomenon, but it also underlines how, although he was influenced by this background, he also radically departed from it. Machiavelli dealt with this political subject in several sections of his works: in particular in his long chapter Delle congiure in the Discorsi (III, 6), which can be considered a comprehensive treatise on plots; in chapter XIX of Il principe; and in some significant chapters of the Istorie fiorentine, where Machiavelli narrates the conspiracies that took place in Italy in the previous centuries. He was the first author to develop a substantial theorization of political plots and he based it on concrete historical examples drawn from previous narratives and from ancient history. Machiavelli’s analysis of conspiracies shares some key elements with the political perspective underlying fifteenth-century literature on plots: his focus on the figure of the prince as the main target of the conspiracy; the importance assigned to the role of the common people and to the issue of building political consensus; the attention paid to internal enemies and internal matters within the state, rather than to the relationship with foreign political forces; the evolution in the analytical approach regarding tyranny and tyrannicide; the centrality of the notion of crimen laesae maiestatis; the emphasis on the negative political outcome of plots.
最后一章考察了马基雅维利的著作与十五世纪关于阴谋论的文学作品之间的关系。分析强调了这种人文主义文学在马基雅维利将阴谋作为一种政治现象的复杂理论的发展中所起的作用,但也强调了尽管他受到这一背景的影响,但他也从根本上背离了这一背景。马基雅维利在他的作品的几个部分中处理了这个政治主题:特别是在他的长篇章节Delle congiure in the Discorsi (III, 6),这可以被认为是对情节的全面论述;《原则》第十九章;在《佛罗伦萨历史》的一些重要章节中,马基雅维利讲述了前几个世纪发生在意大利的阴谋。他是第一个将政治阴谋理论化的作者,他的理论建立在从以前的叙述和古代历史中提取的具体历史例子的基础上。马基雅维利对阴谋的分析,与十五世纪阴谋文学的政治视角有一些共同的关键要素:他把君主的形象作为阴谋的主要目标;重视普通人民的作用和建立政治共识的问题;关注内部敌人和国家内部事务,而不是与外国政治势力的关系;关于暴政和弑君行为的分析方法的演变犯罪的核心概念是犯罪的原罪;强调阴谋的负面政治后果。