Is the Sheath Potential Positive or Negative at Strongly Emitting Surfaces?

M. Campanell, M. Umansky
{"title":"Is the Sheath Potential Positive or Negative at Strongly Emitting Surfaces?","authors":"M. Campanell, M. Umansky","doi":"10.1109/PLASMA.2017.8496075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the recent literature, two distinct sheath solutions under strong electron emission have been reported in theoretical models, simulations, and in experiments [1], a “space-charge limited” (SCL) sheath and an “inverse” sheath. It is important to determine which sheath occurs under what conditions because they lead to sharply different particle and energy fluxes. Our current study [2] offers a unifying analysis of the strong emission problem, addressing both the presheath and sheath. We confirm from first principles that two equilibria, one with SCL sheaths and Bohm presheaths, and one with inverted sheaths/presheaths, are indeed possible whenever the emission coefficient exceeds unity, regardless of the plasma’s upstream properties (e.g., N and Te). However, we also show [3] that if cold ions are born in the potential dip of a SCL sheath, the accumulating ion space charge forces a transition to an inverse sheath. This explains why stable SCL sheaths were only observed in simulation studies without collisions in the plasma domain [4]. Assuming some ionization or CX collisions are always present in real sheaths, we predict only a monotonic inverse sheath should exist at any surface under strong emission conditions, whether a divertor plate, emissive probe, dust grain, Hall thruster channel wall, or sunlit object in space. Our new 1D simulations [2] illustrate that SCL and inverse equilibria have major differences of ion flow velocities and density gradients over presheath length scales. This will enable future experimental studies to identify the sheath state without having to probe inside the sheath itself.","PeriodicalId":145705,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PLASMA.2017.8496075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the recent literature, two distinct sheath solutions under strong electron emission have been reported in theoretical models, simulations, and in experiments [1], a “space-charge limited” (SCL) sheath and an “inverse” sheath. It is important to determine which sheath occurs under what conditions because they lead to sharply different particle and energy fluxes. Our current study [2] offers a unifying analysis of the strong emission problem, addressing both the presheath and sheath. We confirm from first principles that two equilibria, one with SCL sheaths and Bohm presheaths, and one with inverted sheaths/presheaths, are indeed possible whenever the emission coefficient exceeds unity, regardless of the plasma’s upstream properties (e.g., N and Te). However, we also show [3] that if cold ions are born in the potential dip of a SCL sheath, the accumulating ion space charge forces a transition to an inverse sheath. This explains why stable SCL sheaths were only observed in simulation studies without collisions in the plasma domain [4]. Assuming some ionization or CX collisions are always present in real sheaths, we predict only a monotonic inverse sheath should exist at any surface under strong emission conditions, whether a divertor plate, emissive probe, dust grain, Hall thruster channel wall, or sunlit object in space. Our new 1D simulations [2] illustrate that SCL and inverse equilibria have major differences of ion flow velocities and density gradients over presheath length scales. This will enable future experimental studies to identify the sheath state without having to probe inside the sheath itself.
在强发射表面鞘电位是正的还是负的?
在最近的文献中,在理论模型、模拟和实验[1]中报道了两种不同的鞘层在强电子发射下的解,即“空间电荷有限”(SCL)鞘层和“逆”鞘层。确定在什么条件下发生哪种鞘层是很重要的,因为它们会导致截然不同的粒子和能量通量。我们目前的研究[2]提供了对强排放问题的统一分析,涉及鞘前和鞘。我们从第一性原理证实,无论等离子体的上游性质(如N和Te)如何,只要发射系数超过1,就确实可能存在两个平衡,一个是具有SCL鞘和Bohm预鞘的平衡,另一个是具有反向鞘/预鞘的平衡。然而,我们也表明[3],如果冷离子诞生在SCL鞘层的电位倾角中,则积累的离子空间电荷迫使过渡到逆鞘层。这解释了为什么稳定的SCL鞘层只在模拟研究中观察到,在等离子体域中没有碰撞[4]。假设在真实的鞘层中总是存在一些电离或CX碰撞,我们预测在强发射条件下,无论是导流板,发射探针,尘埃颗粒,霍尔推进器通道壁还是空间中的阳光照射物体,在任何表面都应该存在单调的逆鞘层。我们新的一维模拟[2]表明,SCL和逆平衡在鞘鞘长度尺度上的离子流速度和密度梯度有很大差异。这将使未来的实验研究能够识别鞘态,而不必探测鞘本身的内部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信