The Vicious Circles of Control: Regional Governments and Insiders in Privatized Russian Enterprises

Raj M. Desai, Itzhak Goldberg
{"title":"The Vicious Circles of Control: Regional Governments and Insiders in Privatized Russian Enterprises","authors":"Raj M. Desai, Itzhak Goldberg","doi":"10.1596/1813-9450-2287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How can one account for the puzzling behavior of insider-managers who, in stripping assets from the veryfirms they own, appear to be stealing from one pocket to fill the other? The authors suggest that such asset-stripping and failure to restructure are the consequences of interactions between insiders (manager-owners) and regional governments in a particular property rights regime. In this regime, the ability to realize value is limited by uncertainty and illiquidity, so managers have little incentive to increase value. As the central institutions that rule Russia have ceded their powers to the regions, regional governments have imposed various distortions on enterprises to protect local employment. Prospective outsider-investors doubt they can acquire the control rights they need for restructuring firms and doubt they can avoid the distortions regional governments impose on the firms in which they might invest. The result: little restructuring and little new investment. And regional governments, knowing the firms'taxable cash flows will have been reduced through cash flow diversion, have responded by collecting revenues in kind. To disentangle these vicious circles of control, the authors propose a pilot for transforming ownership in insider-dominated firms through a system of simultaneous tax-debt-for-equity conversion and resale through competitive auctions. The objective: to show regional governments, for example, that a more sustainable way to protect employment is to give managers incentives to increase enterprises'value by transferring effective control to investors. The proposed mechanism would provide cash benefits to insiders who agree to sell control to outside investors. The increased cash revenue (rather than in-kind or money surrogates) would enable regional governments to finance safety nets for the unemployed and to promote other regional initiatives.","PeriodicalId":280355,"journal":{"name":"World Bank: Transition Economies (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Bank: Transition Economies (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

How can one account for the puzzling behavior of insider-managers who, in stripping assets from the veryfirms they own, appear to be stealing from one pocket to fill the other? The authors suggest that such asset-stripping and failure to restructure are the consequences of interactions between insiders (manager-owners) and regional governments in a particular property rights regime. In this regime, the ability to realize value is limited by uncertainty and illiquidity, so managers have little incentive to increase value. As the central institutions that rule Russia have ceded their powers to the regions, regional governments have imposed various distortions on enterprises to protect local employment. Prospective outsider-investors doubt they can acquire the control rights they need for restructuring firms and doubt they can avoid the distortions regional governments impose on the firms in which they might invest. The result: little restructuring and little new investment. And regional governments, knowing the firms'taxable cash flows will have been reduced through cash flow diversion, have responded by collecting revenues in kind. To disentangle these vicious circles of control, the authors propose a pilot for transforming ownership in insider-dominated firms through a system of simultaneous tax-debt-for-equity conversion and resale through competitive auctions. The objective: to show regional governments, for example, that a more sustainable way to protect employment is to give managers incentives to increase enterprises'value by transferring effective control to investors. The proposed mechanism would provide cash benefits to insiders who agree to sell control to outside investors. The increased cash revenue (rather than in-kind or money surrogates) would enable regional governments to finance safety nets for the unemployed and to promote other regional initiatives.
控制的恶性循环:俄罗斯私有化企业中的地方政府和内部人士
如何解释内部管理者令人费解的行为呢?他们从自己拥有的公司中剥离资产,似乎是在从一个口袋里偷钱来填另一个口袋。作者认为,在特定的产权制度下,这种资产剥离和重组失败是内部人(管理者-所有者)和地方政府之间相互作用的结果。在这种制度下,实现价值的能力受到不确定性和非流动性的限制,因此管理者几乎没有增加价值的动力。随着统治俄罗斯的中央机构将权力移交给地方,地方政府为了保护当地就业,对企业施加了各种扭曲。潜在的外部投资者怀疑他们能否获得重组公司所需的控制权,也怀疑他们能否避免地方政府对他们可能投资的公司施加的扭曲。其结果是:几乎没有重组,也几乎没有新的投资。地方政府知道这些公司的应税现金流会因现金流转移而减少,因此以征收实物收入作为回应。为了解开这些控制的恶性循环,作者提出了一个试点,通过一个同时进行税收-债务-股权转换和通过竞争性拍卖转售的系统,来转变内部人士主导的公司的所有权。其目的是:向地区政府展示,例如,保护就业的更可持续的方式是通过将有效控制权转移给投资者,激励管理人员增加企业价值。拟议中的机制将向同意将控制权出售给外部投资者的内部人士提供现金奖励。增加的现金收入(而不是实物或货币替代品)将使地区政府能够为失业者的安全网提供资金,并促进其他地区倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信