Research Productivity of Academics in Medicine and Allied Health Sciences Disciplines in Nigerian Universities: A Cross-sectional Multi-stage Cluster Study

A. Oyeyemi, A. Oyeyemi, Aliyu Lawan, Auwal Abubakar, Adamu A Rufai
{"title":"Research Productivity of Academics in Medicine and Allied Health Sciences Disciplines in Nigerian Universities: A Cross-sectional Multi-stage Cluster Study","authors":"A. Oyeyemi, A. Oyeyemi, Aliyu Lawan, Auwal Abubakar, Adamu A Rufai","doi":"10.36413/pjahs.0601.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Research is the act of inquiry to know and is one of the pivotal points and fundamental goals of a university. It is an important part of an academic job and is believed to be the next most valued part of their duty after teaching. Objectives: This study aims to determine the research productivity of Nigerian academics in medicine and allied health sciences disciplines in Nigeria. Methodology: 177 participants completed a 41- items questionnaire that elicits information on sociodemographic, the institution, the program, and research productivity (research papers, conferences attendance and presentation, and book chapters) using a multistage cluster random sampling of Nigerian Universities. Results: Majority of the included participants were male (70.06%), married (79.14%), and below the senior teaching cadre (38.99%). Majority of the academicians do not have any training overseas (67.06%) and have indicated time as a constraint to research productivity (67.06%). Three papers in the past two years is an indication that Nigerian academics in the medical and allied health sciences, on average, may not be deemed to be highly productive. Professors (16.58+27.14) and those in higher ranks (Readers: 11.84+11.22 and senior lectures 12.58+13.53) have published more papers than their counterparts in the junior cadre (lecturer I and II: 4.87+6.58 and 2.69+3.87). Academics in the present study has a median research grant of zero in the past two years. A simple majority of the participants (55.29%) agree on mandating of PhD for promotion and career advancement of academics. There is no difference in the number of papers published (6.04+10.52 and 7.62+13.21) or conferences attended (7.42+19.14 and 4.04 +4.02) between academics in private and public Universities. Conclusion: Apparently low and dismal productivity by these academics in medicine and allied health sciences affirm the need for capacity building on an ongoing basis.","PeriodicalId":145194,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Health Allied Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Health Allied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36413/pjahs.0601.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research is the act of inquiry to know and is one of the pivotal points and fundamental goals of a university. It is an important part of an academic job and is believed to be the next most valued part of their duty after teaching. Objectives: This study aims to determine the research productivity of Nigerian academics in medicine and allied health sciences disciplines in Nigeria. Methodology: 177 participants completed a 41- items questionnaire that elicits information on sociodemographic, the institution, the program, and research productivity (research papers, conferences attendance and presentation, and book chapters) using a multistage cluster random sampling of Nigerian Universities. Results: Majority of the included participants were male (70.06%), married (79.14%), and below the senior teaching cadre (38.99%). Majority of the academicians do not have any training overseas (67.06%) and have indicated time as a constraint to research productivity (67.06%). Three papers in the past two years is an indication that Nigerian academics in the medical and allied health sciences, on average, may not be deemed to be highly productive. Professors (16.58+27.14) and those in higher ranks (Readers: 11.84+11.22 and senior lectures 12.58+13.53) have published more papers than their counterparts in the junior cadre (lecturer I and II: 4.87+6.58 and 2.69+3.87). Academics in the present study has a median research grant of zero in the past two years. A simple majority of the participants (55.29%) agree on mandating of PhD for promotion and career advancement of academics. There is no difference in the number of papers published (6.04+10.52 and 7.62+13.21) or conferences attended (7.42+19.14 and 4.04 +4.02) between academics in private and public Universities. Conclusion: Apparently low and dismal productivity by these academics in medicine and allied health sciences affirm the need for capacity building on an ongoing basis.
尼日利亚大学医学和相关健康科学学科学者的研究生产力:一项横断面多阶段聚类研究
背景:研究是一种探究的行为,是大学的关键和根本目标之一。这是学术工作的重要组成部分,被认为是他们职责中仅次于教学的最有价值的部分。目的:本研究旨在确定尼日利亚医学和相关卫生科学学科的尼日利亚学者的研究生产力。方法:177名参与者完成了一份41项的调查问卷,该问卷采用尼日利亚大学的多阶段随机抽样方法,获取了社会人口学、机构、项目和研究生产力(研究论文、会议出席率和演讲以及书籍章节)方面的信息。结果:以男性(70.06%)、已婚(79.14%)、高级教学干部以下(38.99%)为主。大多数院士(67.06%)没有接受过海外培训,并表示时间限制了研究效率(67.06%)。过去两年发表的三篇论文表明,尼日利亚医学和相关卫生科学的学者平均而言可能不被认为是高产的。教授(16.58+27.14)和更高级别(读者:11.84+11.22,高级讲师:12.58+13.53)比初级干部(讲师1和讲师2:4.87+6.58和2.69+3.87)发表了更多的论文。本研究的学者在过去两年的研究资助中位数为零。绝大多数受访者(55.29%)同意为了学术人员的晋升和职业发展而强制授予博士学位。在发表论文数(6.04+10.52和7.62+13.21)和参加会议数(7.42+19.14和4.04 +4.02)方面,私立大学和公立大学的学者没有差异。结论:这些医学和相关卫生科学领域的学者的生产力明显低下和令人沮丧,这证实了持续进行能力建设的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信