Hip Resurfacing is Associated with Significantly Shorter Length of Stay and Increased Postoperative Mobilization than Total Hip Arthroplasty

Akram A. Habibi, David N. Kugelman, Thomas Bieganowski, W. Macaulay, R. Schwarzkopf, S. Marwin
{"title":"Hip Resurfacing is Associated with Significantly Shorter Length of Stay and Increased Postoperative Mobilization than Total Hip Arthroplasty","authors":"Akram A. Habibi, David N. Kugelman, Thomas Bieganowski, W. Macaulay, R. Schwarzkopf, S. Marwin","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1769083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (HRA) is performed as an alternative for total hip arthroplasty (THA) for symptomatic hip osteoarthritis in young, active male patients. This article seeks to determine if there is a difference in postoperative pain, mobilization, and opioid consumption between HRA and THA. A single-institution total joint arthroplasty database was utilized to identify adult patients who underwent elective HRA or THA between 2016 and 2019. Baseline demographic data along with operative time and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were collected. Patients were matched by age, sex, race, smoking status, body mass index (BMI), and CCI. Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and visual analog scale scores were collected. Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) was used to determine physical therapy progress. A total of 7,387 cases were identified: 96.59% THA (7,135) and 3.41% HRA (252). HRA patients were significantly younger (52.52 vs. 64.04 years; p  < 0.001), had higher BMI (30.03 vs. 29.40; p  = 0.029), and were almost exclusively male as compared with the THA cohort (98.8% vs. 42.2%; p  < 0.001). HRA patients had lower CCI scores (0.36 vs. 1.14; p  < 0.001). Surgical time was greater for HRA (124.81 vs. 103.82 minutes; p  < 0.001). HRA patients had significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) than THA patients (1.17 vs. 1.48 days; p  < 0.001) and had significantly better AM-PAC scores (21.52 vs. 20.65; p  = 0.032). HRA patients exhibited a trend toward home discharge (0.4% vs. 2.4%; p  = 0.057). Aggregate opioid consumption (23.63 vs. 27.89 MME; p  = 0.321) and pain scores (3.47 vs. 3.28; p  = 0.438) were not different between matched cohorts. HRA patients are younger, almost exclusively male, and have lower CCI scores at time of surgery. HRA is associated with significantly shorter LOS and greater mobilization measures. They tended to have a higher rate of home discharge. Both groups had similar pain scores and opioid consumption. Level III  Retrospective Cohort Study.","PeriodicalId":427844,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Hip Surgery","volume":"07 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Hip Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1769083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (HRA) is performed as an alternative for total hip arthroplasty (THA) for symptomatic hip osteoarthritis in young, active male patients. This article seeks to determine if there is a difference in postoperative pain, mobilization, and opioid consumption between HRA and THA. A single-institution total joint arthroplasty database was utilized to identify adult patients who underwent elective HRA or THA between 2016 and 2019. Baseline demographic data along with operative time and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were collected. Patients were matched by age, sex, race, smoking status, body mass index (BMI), and CCI. Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and visual analog scale scores were collected. Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) was used to determine physical therapy progress. A total of 7,387 cases were identified: 96.59% THA (7,135) and 3.41% HRA (252). HRA patients were significantly younger (52.52 vs. 64.04 years; p  < 0.001), had higher BMI (30.03 vs. 29.40; p  = 0.029), and were almost exclusively male as compared with the THA cohort (98.8% vs. 42.2%; p  < 0.001). HRA patients had lower CCI scores (0.36 vs. 1.14; p  < 0.001). Surgical time was greater for HRA (124.81 vs. 103.82 minutes; p  < 0.001). HRA patients had significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) than THA patients (1.17 vs. 1.48 days; p  < 0.001) and had significantly better AM-PAC scores (21.52 vs. 20.65; p  = 0.032). HRA patients exhibited a trend toward home discharge (0.4% vs. 2.4%; p  = 0.057). Aggregate opioid consumption (23.63 vs. 27.89 MME; p  = 0.321) and pain scores (3.47 vs. 3.28; p  = 0.438) were not different between matched cohorts. HRA patients are younger, almost exclusively male, and have lower CCI scores at time of surgery. HRA is associated with significantly shorter LOS and greater mobilization measures. They tended to have a higher rate of home discharge. Both groups had similar pain scores and opioid consumption. Level III  Retrospective Cohort Study.
与全髋关节置换术相比,髋关节置换术的住院时间明显缩短,术后活动能力增加
金属对金属髋关节表面置换(HRA)作为全髋关节置换术(THA)治疗症状性髋关节骨性关节炎年轻,活跃的男性患者的替代方案。本文旨在确定HRA和THA在术后疼痛、活动和阿片类药物消耗方面是否存在差异。使用单一机构全关节置换术数据库来确定2016年至2019年期间接受选择性HRA或THA的成年患者。收集基线人口统计学数据、手术时间和Charlson合并症指数(CCI)。患者按年龄、性别、种族、吸烟状况、体重指数(BMI)和CCI进行匹配。采集吗啡毫克当量(MME)和视觉模拟量表评分。急性护理后活动测量(AM-PAC)用于确定物理治疗进展。共发现7387例,其中THA(7135例)96.59%,HRA(252例)3.41%。HRA患者明显年轻化(52.52岁vs. 64.04岁;p < 0.001), BMI较高(30.03 vs 29.40;p = 0.029),与THA组相比几乎完全为男性(98.8% vs 42.2%;P < 0.001)。HRA患者CCI评分较低(0.36 vs. 1.14;P < 0.001)。HRA的手术时间更长(124.81 vs 103.82分钟);P < 0.001)。HRA患者的住院时间(LOS)明显短于THA患者(1.17 vs 1.48天;p < 0.001), AM-PAC评分显著提高(21.52比20.65;P = 0.032)。HRA患者有回家出院的趋势(0.4% vs. 2.4%;P = 0.057)。阿片类药物总消费量(23.63 vs. 27.89 MME;P = 0.321)和疼痛评分(3.47 vs. 3.28;P = 0.438)在匹配队列间无差异。HRA患者较年轻,几乎全部为男性,手术时CCI评分较低。HRA与明显缩短的LOS和更大的动员措施有关。他们往往有更高的出院率。两组的疼痛评分和阿片类药物用量相似。III级回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信