ENSURING SUCCESS IN THE FLIPPED CLASSROOM WHEN TEACHING ON- LINE

M. Myers
{"title":"ENSURING SUCCESS IN THE FLIPPED CLASSROOM WHEN TEACHING ON- LINE","authors":"M. Myers","doi":"10.36315/2021end093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As teaching moved on-line we had to rethink and readjust what approaches to use in order to reach the outcomes. Adjustments had to be made to the designed activities especially when groups had to meet in breakout rooms. We will present the various aspects that came under scrutiny, as for example, peripheral participation, the development of mini-communities of practice, cooperation, collaboration and mediation. We analyzed instructor’s journal notes and students’ products. There were 53 students in the classes concerned. The main research question is what was effective in making participants improve learning and how did the implementation increase their understanding of working together virtually. The method used is qualitative (Creswell, & Poth, 2018). The instructor took observational notes of processes and actions during planned activities. These notes were analyzed to uncover insights. In addition, student ‘products’ of group work were analyzed for the triangulation of results. Results show that the effort put into creating more engagement in the module brought about a number of interesting results that increased student understanding. Overall, findings show that participants reiterate expectations and summarize them, the repetition allowed a better grasp and this could also be due to the fact that during the reconversion, participants had to make sure they really understood the contents, i.e. ensuring that the meanings were clear which, in turn led to a better intake of specific features. As regards working together, several issues were identified, yet overall, all students were highly successful, due mostly to a supportive approach as regards feedback or a ‘feed-through’ approach. The theoretical underpinnings came from research on learning and pointed to the requirement of additional insights on the part of instructors especially when teaching has to take into account equity, diversity, inclusion and indigenization (EDII). Instruction had to be more connected to students’ lives. Bransford et al (2000) assert that “to develop competence in an area of inquiry, students must: a) have a deep foundation of factual knowledge, b) understand facts and ideas in the context of a conceptual framework, and c) organize knowledge in ways that facilitate retrieval and application” (p. 16).","PeriodicalId":135903,"journal":{"name":"Education and New Developments 2021","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and New Developments 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2021end093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As teaching moved on-line we had to rethink and readjust what approaches to use in order to reach the outcomes. Adjustments had to be made to the designed activities especially when groups had to meet in breakout rooms. We will present the various aspects that came under scrutiny, as for example, peripheral participation, the development of mini-communities of practice, cooperation, collaboration and mediation. We analyzed instructor’s journal notes and students’ products. There were 53 students in the classes concerned. The main research question is what was effective in making participants improve learning and how did the implementation increase their understanding of working together virtually. The method used is qualitative (Creswell, & Poth, 2018). The instructor took observational notes of processes and actions during planned activities. These notes were analyzed to uncover insights. In addition, student ‘products’ of group work were analyzed for the triangulation of results. Results show that the effort put into creating more engagement in the module brought about a number of interesting results that increased student understanding. Overall, findings show that participants reiterate expectations and summarize them, the repetition allowed a better grasp and this could also be due to the fact that during the reconversion, participants had to make sure they really understood the contents, i.e. ensuring that the meanings were clear which, in turn led to a better intake of specific features. As regards working together, several issues were identified, yet overall, all students were highly successful, due mostly to a supportive approach as regards feedback or a ‘feed-through’ approach. The theoretical underpinnings came from research on learning and pointed to the requirement of additional insights on the part of instructors especially when teaching has to take into account equity, diversity, inclusion and indigenization (EDII). Instruction had to be more connected to students’ lives. Bransford et al (2000) assert that “to develop competence in an area of inquiry, students must: a) have a deep foundation of factual knowledge, b) understand facts and ideas in the context of a conceptual framework, and c) organize knowledge in ways that facilitate retrieval and application” (p. 16).
确保翻转课堂在线教学的成功
随着教学转移到网上,我们不得不重新思考和调整使用什么方法来达到目的。必须对设计的活动进行调整,特别是当小组必须在休息室开会时。我们将介绍经过仔细审查的各个方面,例如,外围参与、实践、合作、协作和调解的小型社区的发展。我们分析了老师的笔记和学生的产品。这些班级共有53名学生。主要的研究问题是什么是有效的,使参与者提高学习,以及如何实施增加他们的理解虚拟合作。使用的方法是定性的(Creswell, & Poth, 2018)。指导员在计划活动期间对过程和行动进行观察记录。对这些笔记进行分析,以揭示见解。此外,对学生小组作业的“产品”进行了分析,以便对结果进行三角测量。结果表明,在模块中投入更多的努力带来了一些有趣的结果,提高了学生的理解。总的来说,研究结果表明,参与者重申期望并总结它们,重复可以更好地掌握它们,这也可能是由于在再转换过程中,参与者必须确保他们真正理解内容,即确保含义清晰,从而更好地吸收特定特征。在合作方面,我们发现了一些问题,但总体而言,所有学生都非常成功,这主要归功于反馈方面的支持方法或“反馈贯穿”方法。理论基础来自对学习的研究,并指出教师需要额外的见解,特别是当教学必须考虑到公平、多样性、包容性和本土化(EDII)时。教学必须更加贴近学生的生活。布兰斯福德等人(2000)断言,“要在一个探究领域发展能力,学生必须:a)拥有深厚的事实知识基础;b)在概念框架的背景下理解事实和观点;c)以便于检索和应用的方式组织知识”(第16页)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信