Extracting Rhetorical Question from Twitter

Rinji Suzuki, Akiyo Nadamoto
{"title":"Extracting Rhetorical Question from Twitter","authors":"Rinji Suzuki, Akiyo Nadamoto","doi":"10.1145/3428757.3429123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many types of content exist on SNSs. Sometimes authors' opinions are not properly communicated to the reader. The content might be inflammatory, known as flaming. We infer the importance of extracting passages in which the author's opinion is not communicated correctly when it is presented to the reader. This study particularly examines tweets, a popular message system of the Twitter SNS, and also specifically examines \"rhetorical questions.\" Rhetorical questions are sometimes known as mandarin sentences. People might misunderstand them and might flame the author. We consider it important to extract rhetorical question tweets automatically and present them. This paper proposes a method to extract rhetorical question tweets. First, we propose two definitions of rhetorical question tweets by our preliminary experiment. Next we propose a method extracting rhetorical question tweets based on two definitions. Definition 1 is Including the author's opinion in a question. Definition 2 is Including an author's opinion sentence, commentary sentence, or sentiment reversal in a sentence. Specifically, we proposed a method of opinion sentence extraction, commentary sentence extraction, and sentiment reversal extraction. Furthermore, we conducted two experiments and measured the benefits of our proposed methods.","PeriodicalId":212557,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3428757.3429123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many types of content exist on SNSs. Sometimes authors' opinions are not properly communicated to the reader. The content might be inflammatory, known as flaming. We infer the importance of extracting passages in which the author's opinion is not communicated correctly when it is presented to the reader. This study particularly examines tweets, a popular message system of the Twitter SNS, and also specifically examines "rhetorical questions." Rhetorical questions are sometimes known as mandarin sentences. People might misunderstand them and might flame the author. We consider it important to extract rhetorical question tweets automatically and present them. This paper proposes a method to extract rhetorical question tweets. First, we propose two definitions of rhetorical question tweets by our preliminary experiment. Next we propose a method extracting rhetorical question tweets based on two definitions. Definition 1 is Including the author's opinion in a question. Definition 2 is Including an author's opinion sentence, commentary sentence, or sentiment reversal in a sentence. Specifically, we proposed a method of opinion sentence extraction, commentary sentence extraction, and sentiment reversal extraction. Furthermore, we conducted two experiments and measured the benefits of our proposed methods.
从推特上提取反问句
sns上存在许多类型的内容。有时作者的观点没有恰当地传达给读者。内容可能是煽动性的,被称为煽动性的。我们推断,当作者的观点被呈现给读者时,提取其中没有正确传达的段落的重要性。这项研究特别研究了推特(Twitter SNS的一种流行信息系统),也特别研究了“反问”。反问句有时被称为普通话句。人们可能会误解他们,可能会诋毁作者。我们认为自动提取反问句推文并呈现它们是很重要的。本文提出了一种提取反问句推文的方法。首先,我们通过初步实验提出了反问句推文的两种定义。接下来,我们提出了一种基于两种定义提取反问句推文的方法。定义1是在问题中包含作者的观点。定义二:在一个句子中包含作者的观点句、评论句或情感反转。具体来说,我们提出了一种观点句提取、评论句提取和情感反转提取方法。此外,我们进行了两个实验,并测量了我们提出的方法的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信