A Systematic Approach to Fault Sealing Capacity Evaluation in Underground Gas Storage: A Case Study from China

Rujun Wang, Wei Zhou, Daiyu Zhou, Zangyuan Wu, Liming Lian, Gengping Yan, Guangqiang Shao, C. Zhang, Jun Li, W. Bian, Q. Jin, Zitong Zhao, Yong Zhang, Yantao Deng, Xingning Huang
{"title":"A Systematic Approach to Fault Sealing Capacity Evaluation in Underground Gas Storage: A Case Study from China","authors":"Rujun Wang, Wei Zhou, Daiyu Zhou, Zangyuan Wu, Liming Lian, Gengping Yan, Guangqiang Shao, C. Zhang, Jun Li, W. Bian, Q. Jin, Zitong Zhao, Yong Zhang, Yantao Deng, Xingning Huang","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22981-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Fault stability refers to the risk level of reactivation of the pre-existing fault in the stress field. Fault reactivation within the oilfield is mainly caused by the increase of fluid pressure in the fault zone. The quantitative evaluation index of the fault stability is the critical fluid pressure (that is, additional fluid pressure) required for fault reactivation under the current pore fluid pressure. When the formation pore pressure reaches the critical value, the corresponding fault part will be in the critical stress state. The sliding of the fault in the critical stress state will easily cause oil and gas leakage and casing damage at the edge of the fault. Therefore, it is of great significance to study fault stability for oilfield production. Ground stress is a key parameter for fault stability evaluation. There are many methods to calculate the geomechanics including hydraulic method, acoustic emission method, and the use of the logging data, among which the hydraulic fracturing method can be used to obtain the most accurate horizontal minimum principal stress. This paper calculates the continuous geomechanics by using the logging data. There are many methods available for evaluating fault stability, among which fault sealing analysis technology (FAST) method is most widely used. FAST can be used to not only quantitatively evaluate fault stability, but also evaluate the impact of fault cohesion on fault stability. There are many factors affecting fault stability. The relationship between the differential stress and tensile strength of the fault rock will affect the trend of the fault reactivation.The direction of the stress field also affects the fault stability greatly. The argillaceous material weakens the strength of fault rock. When a large amount of argillaceous material enters the fault zone, the fault tends to reactivate. The change of reservoir fluid pressure will also lead to the change of horizontal stress to affect the stability of the fault. In addition, the accuracy of seismic interpretation will also affect the evaluation results of fault stability. Based on the geological model framework and one-dimensional geomechanical model calibration, this paper establishes a three-dimensional geomechanical model by using the finite element simulation method to carry out four-dimensional geomechanical research to evaluate the fault stability in the development of the Donghe 1 Reservoir in Tarim basin. The research results show that the fracture sealing gradually strengthens during the development of Donghe 1 Reservoir, and the quantized critical fracture opening pressure is 67.38MPa.","PeriodicalId":185347,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22981-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fault stability refers to the risk level of reactivation of the pre-existing fault in the stress field. Fault reactivation within the oilfield is mainly caused by the increase of fluid pressure in the fault zone. The quantitative evaluation index of the fault stability is the critical fluid pressure (that is, additional fluid pressure) required for fault reactivation under the current pore fluid pressure. When the formation pore pressure reaches the critical value, the corresponding fault part will be in the critical stress state. The sliding of the fault in the critical stress state will easily cause oil and gas leakage and casing damage at the edge of the fault. Therefore, it is of great significance to study fault stability for oilfield production. Ground stress is a key parameter for fault stability evaluation. There are many methods to calculate the geomechanics including hydraulic method, acoustic emission method, and the use of the logging data, among which the hydraulic fracturing method can be used to obtain the most accurate horizontal minimum principal stress. This paper calculates the continuous geomechanics by using the logging data. There are many methods available for evaluating fault stability, among which fault sealing analysis technology (FAST) method is most widely used. FAST can be used to not only quantitatively evaluate fault stability, but also evaluate the impact of fault cohesion on fault stability. There are many factors affecting fault stability. The relationship between the differential stress and tensile strength of the fault rock will affect the trend of the fault reactivation.The direction of the stress field also affects the fault stability greatly. The argillaceous material weakens the strength of fault rock. When a large amount of argillaceous material enters the fault zone, the fault tends to reactivate. The change of reservoir fluid pressure will also lead to the change of horizontal stress to affect the stability of the fault. In addition, the accuracy of seismic interpretation will also affect the evaluation results of fault stability. Based on the geological model framework and one-dimensional geomechanical model calibration, this paper establishes a three-dimensional geomechanical model by using the finite element simulation method to carry out four-dimensional geomechanical research to evaluate the fault stability in the development of the Donghe 1 Reservoir in Tarim basin. The research results show that the fracture sealing gradually strengthens during the development of Donghe 1 Reservoir, and the quantized critical fracture opening pressure is 67.38MPa.
地下储气库断层封闭性评价的系统方法——以中国为例
断层稳定性是指已存在的断层在应力场中重新激活的风险水平。油田内部断层的再活化主要是由于断裂带流体压力的增加引起的。断层稳定性的定量评价指标是在当前孔隙流体压力下,断层再激活所需的临界流体压力(即附加流体压力)。当地层孔隙压力达到临界值时,相应的断层部分将处于临界应力状态。断层在临界应力状态下的滑动,容易造成断层边缘的油气泄漏和套管损坏。因此,研究断层稳定性对油田生产具有重要意义。地应力是断层稳定性评价的关键参数。计算地质力学的方法有水力法、声发射法和利用测井资料等多种方法,其中水力压裂法可获得最精确的水平最小主应力。本文利用测井资料计算连续地质力学。评价故障稳定性的方法有很多种,其中FAST(故障密封分析技术)方法应用最为广泛。FAST不仅可以定量评价断层稳定性,还可以评价断层内聚性对断层稳定性的影响。影响故障稳定性的因素很多。断层岩石的差应力与抗拉强度之间的关系将影响断层再活化的趋势。应力场方向对断层稳定性也有很大影响。泥质物质削弱了断层岩的强度。当大量泥质物质进入断裂带时,断层有恢复活动的趋势。储层流体压力的变化也会导致水平应力的变化,从而影响断层的稳定性。此外,地震解释的精度也会影响断层稳定性的评价结果。在地质模型框架和一维地质力学模型标定的基础上,采用有限元模拟方法建立三维地质力学模型,开展四维地质力学研究,评价塔里木盆地东河1号储层发育过程中的断层稳定性。研究结果表明:东河1号储层在发育过程中裂缝封闭性逐渐增强,量化裂缝临界开启压力为67.38MPa;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信