The idea of slavic unity in the works of Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Nazar Nechesnyi
{"title":"The idea of slavic unity in the works of Alexander Solzhenitsyn","authors":"Nazar Nechesnyi","doi":"10.30970/sls.2021.70.3739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Throughout the ХІХ century, Panslavism actually determined the foreign policy of the Russian Empire, and at the same time was a topic to which Russian intellectuals often referred in their works. And although in the ХХ century the ideas of Panslavism lost their significance, they did not disappear and continued to remain a topic for intellectual discussions and debates in scientific and literary circles. Thus, the Russian writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn (1918–2008) repeatedly referred to the analysis of the Slavic idea in his works, trying to find out what influence it had on the development of Russia. Purpose: Objectively cover the views of Solzhenitsyn on the idea of Slavic unity and its role in the development of Russia. It is necessary to analyze the journalistic works of O. Solzhenitsyn, in which he considered issues important to our study. Moreover, the article is an analysis of the reaction to the idea of O. Solzhenitsyn, as well as the impact of the idea on the development of Russia's intellectual environment. Results: An analysis of O. Solzhenitsyn’s works gives grounds to conclude that the theme of Slavic unity did not occupy a central place in his work. The writer considered it only in the context of his concept of the historical development of Russia. According to this concept, first the Russian Empire, and later the USSR, constantly interfered in unnecessary foreign policy adventures, ignoring domestic development. In fact, O. Solzhenitsyn mainly mentioned Panslavism in his essay “The Russian Question until the End of the Twentieth Century”, in which he gave a brief overview of Russian history. The idea of Slavic unity and its role in the history of Russia was negatively assessed by the writer, because the Russian Empire, trying to implement it, spent too many resources, which in turn had a very bad effect on the development of the Russian people. Accordingly, the author warned against repeating such mistakes in the future. However, in the works of O. Solzhenitsyn there is a certain inconsistency when it comes to the Eastern Slavs. This situation can be explained by the writer's ideological convictions as a Russian nationalist: all his proposals, including the unity of the Eastern Slavs within one state, were attempts to theoretically substantiate Russia's right to own East Slavic lands. However, Solzhenitsyn's ideas did not have a significant impact on Russian society and government, as the proposal to focus on domestic development, abandoning constant foreign policy adventures, did not correlate with the imperial character of the Russian people. Keywords: O. Solzhenitsyn, Slavic idea, Panslavism, history of Russia. Dyakov, V., 1994. On the historical and sociological concept of A. Solzhenitsyn. Social Sciences and Modernity, 1, pp.64–76. (In Russian) Dugin, A., 2000. Foundations of Geopolitics. Moscow: Vector–Eurasia. (In Russian) Nizhnikov, S., 2014. Socio-political views of A. I. Solzhenitsyn. Philosophical Sciences, 2, pp.64–74. (In Russian) Thompson, E., 2008. Troubadours of the Empire: Russian Literature and Colonialism. Kyiv: Osnova. (In Ukrainian) Saraskina, L., 2008. Alexander Solzhenitsyn. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya. (In Russian) Saraskina, L., 2010. Frontline fate of Alexander Solzhenitsyn. Public Education, 4, pp.59–64. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 1995. To the All-Russian Patriarch Pimen. In: Solzhenitsyn, A. I. Publicism, 1. Yaroslavl: Verhnyaya Volga, pp.133–137. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 1995a. Letter to the leaders of the Soviet Union. In: Solzhenitsyn, A. I. Publicism, 1. Yaroslavl: Verhnyaya Volga, pp.148–186. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 1995b. How can we equip Russia?. In: Solzhenitsyn, A. I. Publicism, 1. Yaroslavl: Verhnyaya Volga, pp.538–598. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 1995c. The Russian Question by the End of the 20th Century. In: Solzhenitsyn, A. I. Publicism, 1. Yaroslavl: Verhnyaya Volga, pp.616–702. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 1997. Television interview with the Ostankino company. In: Solzhenitsyn, A. I. Publicism, 3. Yaroslavl: Verhnyaya Volga, pp.361–382. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 1997. Interview with Rudolf Augstein for the magazine “Der Spiegel”. In: Solzhenitsyn, A. I. Publicism, 3. Yaroslavl: Verhnyaya Volga, pp.285–320. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 1997. Interview with Forbes magazine. In: Solzhenitsyn, A. I. Publicism, 3. Yaroslavl: Verhnyaya Volga, pp.474–482. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 2003. A grain was pleased between two millstones. Novyi myr, 11, pp.33–97. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 2006. Russia in a landslide. Moscow: Russkij put'. (In Russian) Message from the President to the Federal Assembly [online]. President of Russia. Available: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/messages/65418 [Accessed: 20 September 2021] (In Russian)","PeriodicalId":422873,"journal":{"name":"Problems of slavonic studies","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of slavonic studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2021.70.3739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Throughout the ХІХ century, Panslavism actually determined the foreign policy of the Russian Empire, and at the same time was a topic to which Russian intellectuals often referred in their works. And although in the ХХ century the ideas of Panslavism lost their significance, they did not disappear and continued to remain a topic for intellectual discussions and debates in scientific and literary circles. Thus, the Russian writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn (1918–2008) repeatedly referred to the analysis of the Slavic idea in his works, trying to find out what influence it had on the development of Russia. Purpose: Objectively cover the views of Solzhenitsyn on the idea of Slavic unity and its role in the development of Russia. It is necessary to analyze the journalistic works of O. Solzhenitsyn, in which he considered issues important to our study. Moreover, the article is an analysis of the reaction to the idea of O. Solzhenitsyn, as well as the impact of the idea on the development of Russia's intellectual environment. Results: An analysis of O. Solzhenitsyn’s works gives grounds to conclude that the theme of Slavic unity did not occupy a central place in his work. The writer considered it only in the context of his concept of the historical development of Russia. According to this concept, first the Russian Empire, and later the USSR, constantly interfered in unnecessary foreign policy adventures, ignoring domestic development. In fact, O. Solzhenitsyn mainly mentioned Panslavism in his essay “The Russian Question until the End of the Twentieth Century”, in which he gave a brief overview of Russian history. The idea of Slavic unity and its role in the history of Russia was negatively assessed by the writer, because the Russian Empire, trying to implement it, spent too many resources, which in turn had a very bad effect on the development of the Russian people. Accordingly, the author warned against repeating such mistakes in the future. However, in the works of O. Solzhenitsyn there is a certain inconsistency when it comes to the Eastern Slavs. This situation can be explained by the writer's ideological convictions as a Russian nationalist: all his proposals, including the unity of the Eastern Slavs within one state, were attempts to theoretically substantiate Russia's right to own East Slavic lands. However, Solzhenitsyn's ideas did not have a significant impact on Russian society and government, as the proposal to focus on domestic development, abandoning constant foreign policy adventures, did not correlate with the imperial character of the Russian people. Keywords: O. Solzhenitsyn, Slavic idea, Panslavism, history of Russia. Dyakov, V., 1994. On the historical and sociological concept of A. Solzhenitsyn. Social Sciences and Modernity, 1, pp.64–76. (In Russian) Dugin, A., 2000. Foundations of Geopolitics. Moscow: Vector–Eurasia. (In Russian) Nizhnikov, S., 2014. Socio-political views of A. I. Solzhenitsyn. Philosophical Sciences, 2, pp.64–74. (In Russian) Thompson, E., 2008. Troubadours of the Empire: Russian Literature and Colonialism. Kyiv: Osnova. (In Ukrainian) Saraskina, L., 2008. Alexander Solzhenitsyn. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya. (In Russian) Saraskina, L., 2010. Frontline fate of Alexander Solzhenitsyn. Public Education, 4, pp.59–64. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 1995. To the All-Russian Patriarch Pimen. In: Solzhenitsyn, A. I. Publicism, 1. Yaroslavl: Verhnyaya Volga, pp.133–137. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 1995a. Letter to the leaders of the Soviet Union. In: Solzhenitsyn, A. I. Publicism, 1. Yaroslavl: Verhnyaya Volga, pp.148–186. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 1995b. How can we equip Russia?. In: Solzhenitsyn, A. I. Publicism, 1. Yaroslavl: Verhnyaya Volga, pp.538–598. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 1995c. The Russian Question by the End of the 20th Century. In: Solzhenitsyn, A. I. Publicism, 1. Yaroslavl: Verhnyaya Volga, pp.616–702. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 1997. Television interview with the Ostankino company. In: Solzhenitsyn, A. I. Publicism, 3. Yaroslavl: Verhnyaya Volga, pp.361–382. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 1997. Interview with Rudolf Augstein for the magazine “Der Spiegel”. In: Solzhenitsyn, A. I. Publicism, 3. Yaroslavl: Verhnyaya Volga, pp.285–320. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 1997. Interview with Forbes magazine. In: Solzhenitsyn, A. I. Publicism, 3. Yaroslavl: Verhnyaya Volga, pp.474–482. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 2003. A grain was pleased between two millstones. Novyi myr, 11, pp.33–97. (In Russian) Solzhenitsyn, A., 2006. Russia in a landslide. Moscow: Russkij put'. (In Russian) Message from the President to the Federal Assembly [online]. President of Russia. Available: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/messages/65418 [Accessed: 20 September 2021] (In Russian)
索尔仁尼琴作品中的斯拉夫统一思想
背景:在整个ХІХ世纪中,泛斯拉夫主义实际上决定了俄罗斯帝国的外交政策,同时也是俄罗斯知识分子在其著作中经常提及的话题。虽然在ХХ世纪,泛斯拉夫主义的思想失去了其重要性,但它们并没有消失,而是继续成为科学和文学界知识分子讨论和辩论的话题。因此,俄罗斯作家索尔仁尼琴(Alexander Solzhenitsyn, 1918-2008)在他的作品中多次提到对斯拉夫思想的分析,试图找出它对俄罗斯的发展产生了什么影响。目的:客观地阐述索尔仁尼琴对斯拉夫统一思想的看法及其在俄罗斯发展中的作用。有必要对索尔仁尼琴的新闻作品进行分析,他在其中考虑了一些对我们的研究很重要的问题。此外,本文还分析了人们对索尔仁尼琴思想的反应,以及这一思想对俄罗斯知识环境发展的影响。结果:通过对索尔仁尼琴作品的分析,我们有理由得出这样的结论:斯拉夫统一的主题并没有在他的作品中占据中心位置。作者只是在他对俄国历史发展的概念的背景下考虑这个问题的。根据这一概念,先是俄罗斯帝国,后来是苏联,不断干涉不必要的外交政策冒险,忽视国内发展。事实上,O.索尔仁尼琴在他的文章《直到20世纪末的俄罗斯问题》中主要提到泛斯拉夫主义,他在文章中简要概述了俄罗斯的历史。作者对斯拉夫统一的思想及其在俄罗斯历史上的作用进行了负面评价,因为俄罗斯帝国试图实现它,花费了太多的资源,这反过来对俄罗斯人民的发展产生了非常糟糕的影响。因此,发件人警告今后不要再犯这种错误。然而,在索尔仁尼琴的作品中,当谈到东斯拉夫人时,有一些不一致的地方。这种情况可以用作者作为俄罗斯民族主义者的意识形态信念来解释:他的所有建议,包括将东斯拉夫人统一在一个国家内,都是试图在理论上证实俄罗斯拥有东斯拉夫人土地的权利。然而,索尔仁尼琴的思想并没有对俄罗斯社会和政府产生重大影响,因为他提出的专注于国内发展、放弃不断冒险的外交政策的建议,与俄罗斯人民的帝国性格并不相符。关键词:索尔仁尼琴,斯拉夫思想,泛斯拉夫主义,俄罗斯史Dyakov, V., 1994。论索尔仁尼琴的历史社会学概念。《社会科学与现代性》,第1期,第64 - 76页。杜金,A., 2000。地缘政治基础。莫斯科:Vector-Eurasia。(俄文)Nizhnikov, S., 2014。a·i·索尔仁尼琴的社会政治观点。哲学科学,第2期,页64 - 74。(俄文)汤普森,E., 2008。帝国的吟游诗人:俄国文学与殖民主义。基辅:Osnova。(乌克兰文)萨拉斯基纳,路易斯安那州,2008年。亚历山大•索尔仁尼琴。莫斯科:Molodaya gvardiya。(俄文)萨拉斯基纳,路易斯安那州,2010。亚历山大·索尔仁尼琴的前线命运。《公共教育》,第4期,第59 - 64页。索尔仁尼琴,A., 1995。致全俄大牧首皮门见:索尔仁尼琴,a.i.《公共主义》,1。雅罗斯拉夫尔:伏尔加,第133 - 137页。索尔仁尼琴,A., 1995。给苏联领导人的信。见:索尔仁尼琴,a.i.《公共主义》,1。雅罗斯拉夫尔:伏尔加,第148 - 186页。(俄文)索尔仁尼琴,A., 1995。我们如何装备俄罗斯?见:索尔仁尼琴,a.i.《公共主义》,1。雅罗斯拉夫尔:伏尔加出版社,第538 - 598页。索尔仁尼琴,A., 1995。20世纪末的俄国问题。见:索尔仁尼琴,a.i.《公共主义》,1。雅罗斯拉夫尔:伏尔加,第616 - 702页。索尔仁尼琴,A., 1997。奥斯坦金诺公司的电视采访。见:索尔仁尼琴,a.i.《公共主义》,第3期。雅罗斯拉夫尔:伏尔加,第361 - 382页。索尔仁尼琴,A., 1997。《明镜》杂志对鲁道夫·奥格斯坦的采访。见:索尔仁尼琴,a.i.《公共主义》,第3期。雅罗斯拉夫尔:伏尔加,285 - 320页。索尔仁尼琴,A., 1997。接受《福布斯》杂志采访。见:索尔仁尼琴,a.i.《公共主义》,第3期。雅罗斯拉夫尔:《伏尔加》,第474 - 482页。索尔仁尼琴,A., 2003。两个磨盘磨着一粒麦子。新地理,11,页33 - 97。索尔仁尼琴,A., 2006。俄罗斯以压倒性优势获胜。莫斯科:俄罗斯人。(俄语)总统致联邦议会的贺词[在线]。俄罗斯总统。可获取:http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/messages/65418[访问日期:2021年9月20日](俄文)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信