Modeling of Writing and Thinking Process in Handwriting by Digital Pen Analysis

Kenshin Ikegami, Y. Ohsawa
{"title":"Modeling of Writing and Thinking Process in Handwriting by Digital Pen Analysis","authors":"Kenshin Ikegami, Y. Ohsawa","doi":"10.1109/ICDMW.2014.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to acquire infrequent events as new ideas and evaluate the ideas quantitatively, it is necessary to know how people create and refine ideas and to model creating and refining process. In this paper, we focused on relations between thinking time and writing time in handwriting, and proposed to model the relation by externalization, classification, relation, transportation and systematization, which are elements to make sentences. The relation depended on questions and formats of sheets. When sheets give participants the question answered by sentences, writing time become longer as thinking time is longer. On the other hand, if sheets give the question which could be answered only by words, writing time become shorter as thinking time is longer. We hypothesized that participants spent more time classifying, relating and transporting words in answering only by words than in answering by sentences. We could also confirm that when the same questions were given twice, writing time became longer and thinking time became shorter second time than first time. It was because enough externalizations were performed first time and participants spent less time externalizing second time.","PeriodicalId":289269,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2014.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In order to acquire infrequent events as new ideas and evaluate the ideas quantitatively, it is necessary to know how people create and refine ideas and to model creating and refining process. In this paper, we focused on relations between thinking time and writing time in handwriting, and proposed to model the relation by externalization, classification, relation, transportation and systematization, which are elements to make sentences. The relation depended on questions and formats of sheets. When sheets give participants the question answered by sentences, writing time become longer as thinking time is longer. On the other hand, if sheets give the question which could be answered only by words, writing time become shorter as thinking time is longer. We hypothesized that participants spent more time classifying, relating and transporting words in answering only by words than in answering by sentences. We could also confirm that when the same questions were given twice, writing time became longer and thinking time became shorter second time than first time. It was because enough externalizations were performed first time and participants spent less time externalizing second time.
基于数字笔分析的手写书写与思维过程建模
为了获得不常见的事件作为新的想法,并定量地评估这些想法,有必要了解人们如何创造和提炼想法,并对创造和提炼过程进行建模。本文重点研究了笔迹思维时间与书写时间的关系,并提出了通过外在化、分类化、关联化、传递化和系统化这些构成句子的要素来塑造笔迹思维时间与书写时间的关系。这种关系取决于问题和表格的格式。当纸上给参与者用句子回答的问题时,写作时间随着思考时间的延长而变长。另一方面,如果纸上给出的问题只能用文字来回答,那么写作时间就会变短,而思考时间就会变长。我们假设参与者在用单词回答时比用句子回答时花更多的时间对单词进行分类、联系和传递。我们还可以证实,当同样的问题被给出两次时,第二次的写作时间比第一次长,思考时间比第一次短。这是因为第一次进行了足够多的外化,而参与者第二次花在外化上的时间较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信