Missing Links: The First Amendment's Place in an Ever-Changing Web

E. Holliday
{"title":"Missing Links: The First Amendment's Place in an Ever-Changing Web","authors":"E. Holliday","doi":"10.5195/TLP.2019.228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal questions remain surrounding hateful rhetoric online, including when the government should or can legally step in and do something to prevent acts of terror or hate crimes. This Article explores the current legal landscape surrounding access to publishing online, and its benefits and costs for everyday users and private companies. Through a First Amendment lens, as well as other relevant case law, legislation, and regulation, this Article seeks to provide an understanding of the civil liberty implications of how a change in the law or policy would affect the rights of private companies and publishers and users, both readers and writers of content. This analysis focuses specifically on legal ramifications, protections, and liabilities of major social media outlets and news sites, as well as easily accessible online forums and public-facing websites of hate groups.","PeriodicalId":170628,"journal":{"name":"Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law and Policy","volume":"437 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/TLP.2019.228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Legal questions remain surrounding hateful rhetoric online, including when the government should or can legally step in and do something to prevent acts of terror or hate crimes. This Article explores the current legal landscape surrounding access to publishing online, and its benefits and costs for everyday users and private companies. Through a First Amendment lens, as well as other relevant case law, legislation, and regulation, this Article seeks to provide an understanding of the civil liberty implications of how a change in the law or policy would affect the rights of private companies and publishers and users, both readers and writers of content. This analysis focuses specifically on legal ramifications, protections, and liabilities of major social media outlets and news sites, as well as easily accessible online forums and public-facing websites of hate groups.
缺失的环节:第一修正案在不断变化的网络中的地位
关于网上仇恨言论的法律问题仍然存在,包括政府何时应该或能够合法介入,采取措施防止恐怖行为或仇恨犯罪。本文探讨了当前围绕在线出版访问的法律环境,以及日常用户和私人公司的收益和成本。通过第一修正案的视角,以及其他相关的判例法、立法和法规,本文试图提供对公民自由含义的理解,即法律或政策的变化将如何影响私营公司、出版商和用户(包括读者和内容作者)的权利。该分析特别侧重于主要社交媒体和新闻网站以及易于访问的在线论坛和面向公众的仇恨团体网站的法律后果、保护和责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信