Advanced verification methods and safety critical hardware

Brian Butka
{"title":"Advanced verification methods and safety critical hardware","authors":"Brian Butka","doi":"10.1109/ICNSURV.2012.6218419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the aviation industry RTCA DO-254 is the design assurance process for safety-critical airborne electronic hardware development. Safety-critical hardware (DAL A or B) requires the application of additional advanced verification techniques such as Elemental Analysis to ensure that elements of the design are adequately verified. This paper compares the verification processes currently used in the semiconductor industry to what is commonly used to meet DO-254 guidelines. Requirements based testing as specified in DO-254 is widely viewed as being inadequate to assure design correctness of complex hardware. Additional robustness testing techniques such as constrained random testing and assertions are typically used to improve the verification process. A methodology of subjecting the design to constrained random verification testing throughout the design process is examined. The applicability of this proposed process to DO-254 based design is evaluated.","PeriodicalId":126055,"journal":{"name":"2012 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSURV.2012.6218419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Within the aviation industry RTCA DO-254 is the design assurance process for safety-critical airborne electronic hardware development. Safety-critical hardware (DAL A or B) requires the application of additional advanced verification techniques such as Elemental Analysis to ensure that elements of the design are adequately verified. This paper compares the verification processes currently used in the semiconductor industry to what is commonly used to meet DO-254 guidelines. Requirements based testing as specified in DO-254 is widely viewed as being inadequate to assure design correctness of complex hardware. Additional robustness testing techniques such as constrained random testing and assertions are typically used to improve the verification process. A methodology of subjecting the design to constrained random verification testing throughout the design process is examined. The applicability of this proposed process to DO-254 based design is evaluated.
先进的验证方法和安全关键硬件
在航空工业中,RTCA DO-254是安全关键机载电子硬件开发的设计保证过程。安全关键硬件(DAL A或DAL B)需要应用额外的高级验证技术,例如元素分析,以确保设计的元素得到充分验证。本文将目前在半导体行业中使用的验证过程与通常用于满足DO-254指南的验证过程进行了比较。DO-254中规定的基于需求的测试被广泛认为不足以确保复杂硬件的设计正确性。附加的健壮性测试技术,如约束随机测试和断言,通常用于改进验证过程。在整个设计过程中,对设计进行约束随机验证测试的方法进行了检验。评估了该过程在基于DO-254的设计中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信