R. Messnarz, Hans-Leo Ross, S. Habel, Frank König, Abdelhadi Koundoussi, Jürgen Unterreitmayer, D. Ekert
{"title":"Integrated Automotive SPICE and safety assessments","authors":"R. Messnarz, Hans-Leo Ross, S. Habel, Frank König, Abdelhadi Koundoussi, Jürgen Unterreitmayer, D. Ekert","doi":"10.1002/spip.429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2005 Automotive SPICE (based on ISO 15504) has been published (see ) and used in major automotive firms world wide. In parallel the topic ‘Functional Safety’ became important due to changes in liability law and the development of IEC 61508 as an application and branch independent standard for functional safety. As a result, ISO WD 26262 a ISO draft for functional safety has been initiated classifying systems with ASIL (automotive safety integrity levels) levels and requiring additional processes, techniques, and methods to illustrate the competence for managing systems that have an impact on the loss of lives. \n \nAn Automotive SPICE assessment usually takes (for the processes defined in the scope of the German automotive manufacturing association) 4 days per project. Adding the scope of a safety assessment this dramatically increases the number of hours used in assessments. In a working group of major automotive suppliers and assessment tool suppliers, we developed from 2005 to 2009 an integrated assessment approach. Portals in the above-mentioned automotive suppliers already use this environment. \n \nThe working group that elaborated the methods and tools described in this paper are part of the SOQRATES initiative () where more than 20 leading German firms collaborate in cross-company task forces. \n \nIn this paper, we want to explain the results of the analysis done, the assessment model applied, and what kind of reports the integrated assessment environment is producing. The results of all work (except of the proprietary assessment tools) will be made public to all suppliers in 2009. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":379836,"journal":{"name":"Softw. Process. Improv. Pract.","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Softw. Process. Improv. Pract.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/spip.429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26
集成汽车SPICE和安全评估
2005年,汽车香料(基于ISO 15504)已经出版(见),并在世界各地的主要汽车公司使用。与此同时,由于责任法的变化和IEC 61508作为功能安全的应用和分支独立标准的发展,“功能安全”主题变得重要。因此,ISO WD 26262(一个功能安全的ISO草案)已经开始用ASIL(汽车安全完整性等级)等级对系统进行分类,并要求额外的流程、技术和方法来说明管理对生命损失有影响的系统的能力。每个项目的汽车SPICE评估通常需要4天(对于在德国汽车制造协会范围内定义的过程)。增加安全评估的范围,这极大地增加了评估中使用的小时数。在一个由主要汽车供应商和评估工具供应商组成的工作组中,我们从2005年到2009年开发了一种综合评估方法。上述汽车供应商中的门户已经使用了这种环境。阐述本文中描述的方法和工具的工作组是SOQRATES计划()的一部分,其中20多家领先的德国公司在跨公司任务小组中合作。在本文中,我们想要解释所做的分析的结果,所应用的评估模型,以及综合评估环境正在产生什么样的报告。所有工作的结果(专有评估工具除外)将于2009年向所有供应商公布。版权所有©2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。