Chapter 5 Revisiting “Traits To Rates” After 25 Years: Organizational Ecology’s Limited Impact on Entrepreneurship Research

Akram Al-Turk, H. Aldrich
{"title":"Chapter 5 Revisiting “Traits To Rates” After 25 Years: Organizational Ecology’s Limited Impact on Entrepreneurship Research","authors":"Akram Al-Turk, H. Aldrich","doi":"10.1108/S1074-754020190000021004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, the authors investigate the degree to which organizational ecology (OE) had a long-term impact on the way scholars study organizational foundings. Dubbed the “rates” approach by Aldrich and Weidenmayer (1993), OE argued that organizational foundings depend on intra- and inter-population processes such as organizational density, prior foundings, and prior disbandings. It de-emphasized the personal characteristics of founders and entrepreneurs – the “traits” approach. The analyses reveal that OE had limited impact, especially after the mid-2000s. OE’s limited appeal is partially explained by its lack of influence on scholars outside its orbit of influence and/or those publishing in non-sociology journals. In contrast to OE’s slight long-term impact, the authors argue that another perspective that was attuned to environmental conditions – new institutional theory (NIT) – has had greater success in influencing scholars studying foundings. The authors speculate that OE’s impact was ultimately limited because it was embedded in a relatively exclusive scholarly community, compared to NIT’s more inclusive scope.","PeriodicalId":265948,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1074-754020190000021004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors investigate the degree to which organizational ecology (OE) had a long-term impact on the way scholars study organizational foundings. Dubbed the “rates” approach by Aldrich and Weidenmayer (1993), OE argued that organizational foundings depend on intra- and inter-population processes such as organizational density, prior foundings, and prior disbandings. It de-emphasized the personal characteristics of founders and entrepreneurs – the “traits” approach. The analyses reveal that OE had limited impact, especially after the mid-2000s. OE’s limited appeal is partially explained by its lack of influence on scholars outside its orbit of influence and/or those publishing in non-sociology journals. In contrast to OE’s slight long-term impact, the authors argue that another perspective that was attuned to environmental conditions – new institutional theory (NIT) – has had greater success in influencing scholars studying foundings. The authors speculate that OE’s impact was ultimately limited because it was embedded in a relatively exclusive scholarly community, compared to NIT’s more inclusive scope.
第5章:25年后“从特质到比率”的再审视:组织生态学对创业研究的有限影响
在本章中,作者研究了组织生态学对学者研究组织基础的方式的长期影响程度。被Aldrich和Weidenmayer(1993)称为“比率”方法的OE认为,组织的建立取决于人口内部和人口之间的过程,如组织密度、先前的建立和先前的解散。它不再强调创始人和企业家的个人特征——即“特质”方法。分析显示,OE的影响有限,尤其是在2000年代中期之后。OE的吸引力有限,部分原因是它对其影响范围之外的学者和/或在非社会学期刊上发表文章的学者缺乏影响力。与OE轻微的长期影响相比,作者认为,另一种与环境条件相适应的观点——新制度理论(NIT)——在影响研究基础的学者方面取得了更大的成功。作者推测,OE的影响最终是有限的,因为与NIT更具包容性的范围相比,它被嵌入了一个相对排外的学术社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信