Ricardo Lebbos Favoreto, Saulo Fabiano Amâncio-Vieira, A. Nogueira, Pablo Henrique Paschoal Capucho, Carlos Eduardo de Lima
{"title":"Recursos e Estratégia: Remontando às Perspectivas Teóricas Primigênias","authors":"Ricardo Lebbos Favoreto, Saulo Fabiano Amâncio-Vieira, A. Nogueira, Pablo Henrique Paschoal Capucho, Carlos Eduardo de Lima","doi":"10.5585/RIAE.V18I2.2751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Our objective in this article was to revisit some of the main studies on the resource-based perspective and, additionally, point out possibilities for theoretical development. Method: The texts were accessed through the book “Resources, firms, and strategies”, by Nicolai J. Foss. We also seek insights from three contemporary papers. Originality/relevance: The resource-based perspective is one of the most pervasive theories in the field of strategy. Revisiting the work edited by Foss, which contains texts written by seminal authors of the field, allowed us to identify their origins and reflect on the contemporary production. The study also allowed us to prospect relevant theoretical extensions for the apprehension of new realities. Results: We present interrelations among the texts that make up the book reviewed and three papers. This exercise allowed us to look up at classic texts of the theoretical field and contemporary researches at the same time. Theoretical/methodological Contributions: Revisiting seminal texts from the field contributes to keeping alive the academic debate on the memory of its theoretical foundations. More than three decades after the denomination of the Resource-based View - which occurred in the paper published by Birger Wernerfelt (1984) - reflective insights about the evolution of the field are appropriate. This review evokes its bases and repositions them in current times. It also draws attention to some issues that still require theoretical development, as well as suggests ways for new theoretical explorations. Context issues, such as globalization and sustainability, subsidize renewed proposals.","PeriodicalId":353150,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5585/RIAE.V18I2.2751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Our objective in this article was to revisit some of the main studies on the resource-based perspective and, additionally, point out possibilities for theoretical development. Method: The texts were accessed through the book “Resources, firms, and strategies”, by Nicolai J. Foss. We also seek insights from three contemporary papers. Originality/relevance: The resource-based perspective is one of the most pervasive theories in the field of strategy. Revisiting the work edited by Foss, which contains texts written by seminal authors of the field, allowed us to identify their origins and reflect on the contemporary production. The study also allowed us to prospect relevant theoretical extensions for the apprehension of new realities. Results: We present interrelations among the texts that make up the book reviewed and three papers. This exercise allowed us to look up at classic texts of the theoretical field and contemporary researches at the same time. Theoretical/methodological Contributions: Revisiting seminal texts from the field contributes to keeping alive the academic debate on the memory of its theoretical foundations. More than three decades after the denomination of the Resource-based View - which occurred in the paper published by Birger Wernerfelt (1984) - reflective insights about the evolution of the field are appropriate. This review evokes its bases and repositions them in current times. It also draws attention to some issues that still require theoretical development, as well as suggests ways for new theoretical explorations. Context issues, such as globalization and sustainability, subsidize renewed proposals.
目的:本文的目的是回顾资源基础视角的一些主要研究,并指出理论发展的可能性。方法:通过Nicolai J. Foss的《资源、公司和战略》一书获取文本。我们还从三篇当代论文中寻求见解。原创性/相关性:资源基础视角是战略领域中最普遍的理论之一。重新审视由Foss编辑的作品,其中包含由该领域的开创性作者撰写的文本,使我们能够确定它们的起源并反思当代生产。这项研究还使我们能够展望有关的理论扩展,以理解新的现实。结果:我们展示了组成书评和三篇论文的文本之间的相互关系。这个练习使我们能够同时查阅理论领域的经典文本和当代研究。理论/方法贡献:重新审视该领域的开创性文本有助于保持对其理论基础记忆的学术辩论的活力。在资源基础观点命名三十多年后——它出现在Birger Wernerfelt(1984)发表的论文中——对该领域演变的反思是恰当的。这篇评论唤起了它的基础,并在当前时代重新定位它们。它也引起了人们对一些仍需要理论发展的问题的关注,并为新的理论探索提供了途径。背景问题,如全球化和可持续性,补贴了新的提案。