A New Innovative Cement Evaluation Method for Highly Deviated or Horizontal Wells

A. Kumar, K. Singh, D. S. Oliver, S. Dutta
{"title":"A New Innovative Cement Evaluation Method for Highly Deviated or Horizontal Wells","authors":"A. Kumar, K. Singh, D. S. Oliver, S. Dutta","doi":"10.2118/215510-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Evaluation of cement integrity to prevent fluid migration in the annular space behind casing may become challenging under certain well conditions. Conventional cement evaluation tools are useful in most scenarios, but in highly challenging operations (deviated or horizontal wells), there is a pressing need for more advanced cement evaluation and processing techniques to increase the confidence of the measurements for the evaluation of wellbore integrity.\n Pulse-Echo and/or Flexural wave measurement, along with sonic measurements, are generally run in tandem for improved cement evaluation. The method relies on knowing the wellbore fluid properties (acoustic velocity and acoustic impedance), which may change in deviated or horizontal sections of a well due to mud settling or mud segregation with lighter components on the high side and heavier components on the lower side of the well. This segregation phenomenon, if not accounted for, results in erroneous cement interpretation answers with uncertainty, such as low-acoustic impedance stripe in the direction of heavier mud components. A new advanced ultrasonic technology and its embedded unique inversion processing known as R+, based on 3-parameter inversion approach is developed, which first computes the wellbore mud impedance 360 deg and then uses it as an input to compute the annular material acoustic impedance accurately. This method can also reveal wellbore conditions such as mud settling and segregation.\n This paper demonstrates the application of new advanced ultrasonic tool and the R+ inversion processing through multiple case studies. In all the cases explained in the paper, we see that due to mud segregation in the borehole, it was difficult to identify true annular conditions. The R+ inversion method was used to confirm the wellbore fluid heterogeneity. All the case studies compare cement evaluation performed using the classic T3 method with R+ inversion method. The uncertainties faced due to mud segregation inside the wellbore were properly addressed with the new R+ inversion method, and the final cement interpretation helps the operators in taking operational decisions in time.\n The advanced ultrasonic technology and R+ inversion method will ensure accurate cement evaluation in challenging wellbore environments where mud segregation is expected irrespective of casing sizes and cement types. With accurate cement evaluation, the operators can avoid unnecessary costly cement remedial operations at any point (new well, intervention, plug and abandonment), thus impacting the rig activities.","PeriodicalId":213852,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 06, 2023","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 06, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/215510-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluation of cement integrity to prevent fluid migration in the annular space behind casing may become challenging under certain well conditions. Conventional cement evaluation tools are useful in most scenarios, but in highly challenging operations (deviated or horizontal wells), there is a pressing need for more advanced cement evaluation and processing techniques to increase the confidence of the measurements for the evaluation of wellbore integrity. Pulse-Echo and/or Flexural wave measurement, along with sonic measurements, are generally run in tandem for improved cement evaluation. The method relies on knowing the wellbore fluid properties (acoustic velocity and acoustic impedance), which may change in deviated or horizontal sections of a well due to mud settling or mud segregation with lighter components on the high side and heavier components on the lower side of the well. This segregation phenomenon, if not accounted for, results in erroneous cement interpretation answers with uncertainty, such as low-acoustic impedance stripe in the direction of heavier mud components. A new advanced ultrasonic technology and its embedded unique inversion processing known as R+, based on 3-parameter inversion approach is developed, which first computes the wellbore mud impedance 360 deg and then uses it as an input to compute the annular material acoustic impedance accurately. This method can also reveal wellbore conditions such as mud settling and segregation. This paper demonstrates the application of new advanced ultrasonic tool and the R+ inversion processing through multiple case studies. In all the cases explained in the paper, we see that due to mud segregation in the borehole, it was difficult to identify true annular conditions. The R+ inversion method was used to confirm the wellbore fluid heterogeneity. All the case studies compare cement evaluation performed using the classic T3 method with R+ inversion method. The uncertainties faced due to mud segregation inside the wellbore were properly addressed with the new R+ inversion method, and the final cement interpretation helps the operators in taking operational decisions in time. The advanced ultrasonic technology and R+ inversion method will ensure accurate cement evaluation in challenging wellbore environments where mud segregation is expected irrespective of casing sizes and cement types. With accurate cement evaluation, the operators can avoid unnecessary costly cement remedial operations at any point (new well, intervention, plug and abandonment), thus impacting the rig activities.
一种创新的大斜度或水平井固井评价方法
在某些井况下,评估水泥完整性以防止套管后环空空间中的流体运移可能会变得具有挑战性。传统的固井评价工具在大多数情况下都是有用的,但在具有高度挑战性的作业(斜井或水平井)中,迫切需要更先进的固井评价和处理技术,以提高评价井筒完整性的测量可信度。脉冲回波和/或弯曲波测量通常与声波测量一起进行,以改善水泥评价。该方法依赖于了解井筒流体特性(声速和声阻抗),在斜井段或水平井段,由于泥浆沉降或泥浆离析,这些特性可能会发生变化,在井的高侧成分较轻,在井的低侧成分较重。如果不考虑这种离析现象,就会导致错误的不确定性水泥解释答案,例如在泥浆成分较重的方向出现低声阻抗条纹。基于3参数反演方法,开发了一种新的先进超声技术及其嵌入的独特反演处理方法R+,该技术首先计算360度井眼泥浆阻抗,然后将其作为输入,精确计算环空材料声阻抗。该方法还可以揭示井眼状况,如泥浆沉降和离析。本文通过多个实例说明了新型先进超声工具和R+反演处理的应用。在文中解释的所有情况中,我们发现由于井眼内的泥浆离析,很难识别真实的环空情况。采用R+反演方法确定井筒流体非均质性。所有的案例研究都比较了使用经典T3方法和R+反演方法进行的水泥评价。新的R+反演方法可以很好地解决井筒内泥浆离析所带来的不确定性,最终的水泥解释有助于作业者及时做出作业决策。先进的超声波技术和R+反演方法将确保在具有挑战性的井眼环境中进行准确的固井评估,无论套管尺寸和水泥类型如何,都希望实现泥浆分离。通过准确的固井评估,作业者可以在任何时候(新井、干预、桥塞和弃井)避免不必要的昂贵固井补救作业,从而影响钻机的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信