Standing on the Shoulders of Web Giants: The Economic Effects of Personal Data Brokers

Bastian Haberer, J. Krämer, Daniel Schnurr
{"title":"Standing on the Shoulders of Web Giants: The Economic Effects of Personal Data Brokers","authors":"Bastian Haberer, J. Krämer, Daniel Schnurr","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3141946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internet users create a wealth of (personal) data when using content and service providers (CSPs), who then sell this data on the data market. Personal data markets (PDMs) encourage users to port their data from CSPs and enable them to sell their data directly. In Europe, this is further facilitated by the right to data portability introduced by the General Data Protection Regulation. Based on a game-theoretic model, we investigate how a PDM affects the CSP's incentives to invest in the quality of its service, and its pricing strategy for consumers. We identify three, partially countervailing, economic effects that govern the relevant strategic trade-offs in an Internet market with PDM. On the one hand, the presence of a PDM will induce the CSP to reduce the quality of its service, (1) because it faces lower revenues in the data market (competition effect), and (2) because it can free-ride on the PDM-induced data creation incentive for users (displacement effect). On the other hand, a PDM will lead to an increase in the CSP's quality, (3) because the CSP can partially appropriate the additional consumer surplus that has been created by the PDM through an increase in its price for the service (appropriation effect). The strengths of these effects depend crucially on the PDM's efficiency on the data market, and consumers will only be able to benefit if the PDM can sell data more efficiently than the CSP.","PeriodicalId":172652,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Market Structure (Topic)","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Market Structure (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3141946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Internet users create a wealth of (personal) data when using content and service providers (CSPs), who then sell this data on the data market. Personal data markets (PDMs) encourage users to port their data from CSPs and enable them to sell their data directly. In Europe, this is further facilitated by the right to data portability introduced by the General Data Protection Regulation. Based on a game-theoretic model, we investigate how a PDM affects the CSP's incentives to invest in the quality of its service, and its pricing strategy for consumers. We identify three, partially countervailing, economic effects that govern the relevant strategic trade-offs in an Internet market with PDM. On the one hand, the presence of a PDM will induce the CSP to reduce the quality of its service, (1) because it faces lower revenues in the data market (competition effect), and (2) because it can free-ride on the PDM-induced data creation incentive for users (displacement effect). On the other hand, a PDM will lead to an increase in the CSP's quality, (3) because the CSP can partially appropriate the additional consumer surplus that has been created by the PDM through an increase in its price for the service (appropriation effect). The strengths of these effects depend crucially on the PDM's efficiency on the data market, and consumers will only be able to benefit if the PDM can sell data more efficiently than the CSP.
站在网络巨头的肩膀上:个人数据经纪人的经济影响
互联网用户在使用内容和服务提供商(csp)时创造了大量(个人)数据,然后csp在数据市场上出售这些数据。个人数据市场(pdm)鼓励用户从csp移植他们的数据,并使他们能够直接出售他们的数据。在欧洲,《一般数据保护条例》引入的数据可移植性权利进一步促进了这一点。基于博弈论模型,我们研究了PDM如何影响CSP对其服务质量的投资激励,以及它对消费者的定价策略。我们确定了三种部分抵消的经济效应,它们支配着互联网市场中与PDM相关的战略权衡。一方面,PDM的存在会导致CSP降低其服务质量,(1)因为它在数据市场上面临更低的收入(竞争效应),(2)因为它可以免费利用PDM诱导的用户数据创建激励(位移效应)。另一方面,PDM将导致CSP质量的提高,(3)因为CSP可以通过提高其服务价格部分地占用PDM所创造的额外消费者剩余(占用效应)。这些效应的强弱在很大程度上取决于PDM在数据市场上的效率,只有PDM比CSP更有效地销售数据,消费者才能从中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信