‘Sine amore, sine odio partium’: Nicolaus Burgundius’ Historia Belgica (1629) and his Tacitean Quest for an Appropriate Past

M. Laureys
{"title":"‘Sine amore, sine odio partium’: Nicolaus Burgundius’ Historia Belgica (1629) and his Tacitean Quest for an Appropriate Past","authors":"M. Laureys","doi":"10.1163/9789004378216_017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the 16th century onwards, Tacitus drew ever more attention for the help he could provide in coming to terms with the various turbulences and upheavals of the early modern age. Humanist scholars, such as Marcus Antonius Muretus and Justus Lipsius, observed a striking resemblance between the politics of the early principate, narrated by Tacitus, and their own times. For 16thand 17th-century readers of Tacitus the turmoils, machinations and rebellions he evoked looked very familiar. This avowed similarity carried further implications. The historical constellations described by Tacitus could serve as a reference framework to interpret and legitimate contemporary political events, circumstances and developments. In order to understand the present, the history depicted by Tacitus could be adduced as an appropriate past. In this context Tacitus exerted a double influence. In the field of political theory and philosophy he was a source of inspiration for a variety of political currents and theories, supporting either republican or princely rule. In terms of language and style, moreover, Tacitus offered a standard that was felt to be perfectly suitable to the political discourse of early modern times, not least in the political communication between a ruler and the advisors and attendants in his court. Tacitus was advanced – most prominently by Justus Lipsius – as a model author who perfectly illustrated the techniques of simulatio and dissimulatio (Tacitus, Annales, 4, 71, 3) as well as the characteristics of the ‘imperatoria brevitas’ (Tacitus, Historiae, 1, 18, 2). The Low Countries, torn apart in the 16th century by political and religious conflicts, provided ample opportunities for observation and analysis through a Tacitean framework. Tacitus’ description (in Books 4 and 5 of his Historiae) of the Batavian uprising, led by Julius Civilis, against Rome almost invited comparison with the Dutch Revolt. The rebellion of the northern provinces of the Low Countries against Spanish rule, was from the very beginning observed and recorded by humanist literati, diplomats, and merchants from various parts of","PeriodicalId":104280,"journal":{"name":"The Quest for an Appropriate Past in Literature, Art and Architecture","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Quest for an Appropriate Past in Literature, Art and Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004378216_017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the 16th century onwards, Tacitus drew ever more attention for the help he could provide in coming to terms with the various turbulences and upheavals of the early modern age. Humanist scholars, such as Marcus Antonius Muretus and Justus Lipsius, observed a striking resemblance between the politics of the early principate, narrated by Tacitus, and their own times. For 16thand 17th-century readers of Tacitus the turmoils, machinations and rebellions he evoked looked very familiar. This avowed similarity carried further implications. The historical constellations described by Tacitus could serve as a reference framework to interpret and legitimate contemporary political events, circumstances and developments. In order to understand the present, the history depicted by Tacitus could be adduced as an appropriate past. In this context Tacitus exerted a double influence. In the field of political theory and philosophy he was a source of inspiration for a variety of political currents and theories, supporting either republican or princely rule. In terms of language and style, moreover, Tacitus offered a standard that was felt to be perfectly suitable to the political discourse of early modern times, not least in the political communication between a ruler and the advisors and attendants in his court. Tacitus was advanced – most prominently by Justus Lipsius – as a model author who perfectly illustrated the techniques of simulatio and dissimulatio (Tacitus, Annales, 4, 71, 3) as well as the characteristics of the ‘imperatoria brevitas’ (Tacitus, Historiae, 1, 18, 2). The Low Countries, torn apart in the 16th century by political and religious conflicts, provided ample opportunities for observation and analysis through a Tacitean framework. Tacitus’ description (in Books 4 and 5 of his Historiae) of the Batavian uprising, led by Julius Civilis, against Rome almost invited comparison with the Dutch Revolt. The rebellion of the northern provinces of the Low Countries against Spanish rule, was from the very beginning observed and recorded by humanist literati, diplomats, and merchants from various parts of
从16世纪开始,塔西佗因其在应对早期现代的各种动荡和动荡方面所能提供的帮助而吸引了越来越多的关注。人文主义学者,如马库斯·安东尼乌斯·穆雷图斯和尤斯图斯·利普修斯,观察到塔西佗叙述的早期元首制政治与他们自己的时代有着惊人的相似之处。对于16世纪和17世纪塔西佗的读者来说,他所唤起的混乱、阴谋和叛乱看起来非常熟悉。这种公开的相似性带来了进一步的含义。塔西佗所描述的历史星座可以作为一个参考框架来解释和解释当代的政治事件、环境和发展。为了理解现在,塔西佗所描述的历史可以被引用为一个合适的过去。在这方面,塔西佗发挥了双重影响。在政治理论和哲学领域,他是各种政治潮流和理论的灵感来源,支持共和或君主统治。此外,在语言和风格方面,塔西佗提供了一种标准,被认为非常适合于近代早期的政治话语,尤其是在统治者与他的宫廷顾问和随从之间的政治交流中。塔西佗(尤斯图斯·利普修斯最为突出)是一位模范作家,他完美地阐述了模拟和伪装的技巧(塔西佗,《年历》,4,71,3),以及“短时间法则”的特征(塔西佗,《历史》,1,18,2)。在16世纪因政治和宗教冲突而四分五裂的低地国家,提供了通过塔西佗框架进行观察和分析的充足机会。塔西佗在他的《历史》第4卷和第5卷中描述了由尤利乌斯·西维利斯领导的反对罗马的巴达维亚起义,几乎可以与荷兰起义相提并论。低地国家北部省份反抗西班牙统治的叛乱,从一开始就被来自欧洲各地的人文主义文人、外交官和商人观察和记录下来
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信