Revisiting Inner Entanglements in Classical Planning

L. Chrpa, M. Vallati
{"title":"Revisiting Inner Entanglements in Classical Planning","authors":"L. Chrpa, M. Vallati","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-330-8-75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Automated Planning, learning and exploiting structural patterns of plans, domain models and/or problem models, in order to improve plan generation speed-up and increase the scope of problems solved, has attracted much research. Reformulation techniques such as those based on macro-operators or entanglements are very promising, mainly because they are planner independent. This paper aims to extend and revisit the recent work on inner entanglements, relations between pairs of planning operators and predicates encapsulating exclusivity of predicate ‘achievements‘ or ‘requirements’, in order to bring new theoretical results (PSPACE completeness of deciding inner entanglements), present a new way of encoding of inner entanglements and empirical comparison between different kinds of inner entanglements.","PeriodicalId":322432,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Conference on AI","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Conference on AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-330-8-75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In Automated Planning, learning and exploiting structural patterns of plans, domain models and/or problem models, in order to improve plan generation speed-up and increase the scope of problems solved, has attracted much research. Reformulation techniques such as those based on macro-operators or entanglements are very promising, mainly because they are planner independent. This paper aims to extend and revisit the recent work on inner entanglements, relations between pairs of planning operators and predicates encapsulating exclusivity of predicate ‘achievements‘ or ‘requirements’, in order to bring new theoretical results (PSPACE completeness of deciding inner entanglements), present a new way of encoding of inner entanglements and empirical comparison between different kinds of inner entanglements.
重新审视经典规划中的内在纠缠
在自动化规划中,学习和开发计划、领域模型和/或问题模型的结构模式,以提高计划生成的速度和增加解决问题的范围,引起了人们的广泛研究。基于宏观操作符或纠缠的重构技术非常有前途,主要是因为它们与规划器无关。本文旨在扩展和回顾最近关于内纠缠、计划算子对之间的关系以及封装谓词“成就”或“要求”的排他性的谓词的工作,以带来新的理论结果(决定内纠缠的PSPACE完备性),提出一种新的内纠缠编码方式和不同类型内纠缠之间的经验比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信