Probabilistic Model Checking for Strategic Equilibria-based Decision Making: Advances and Challenges

M. Kwiatkowska, G. Norman, Gabriel Santos, Rui Yan
{"title":"Probabilistic Model Checking for Strategic Equilibria-based Decision Making: Advances and Challenges","authors":"M. Kwiatkowska, G. Norman, Gabriel Santos, Rui Yan","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2206.15148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Game-theoretic concepts have been extensively studied in economics to provide insight into competitive behaviour and strategic decision making. As computing systems increasingly involve concurrently acting autonomous agents, game-theoretic approaches are becoming widespread in computer science as a faithful modelling abstraction. These techniques can be used to reason about the competitive or collaborative behaviour of multiple rational agents with distinct goals or objectives. This paper provides an overview of recent advances in developing a modelling, verification and strategy synthesis framework for concurrent stochastic games implemented in the probabilistic model checker PRISM-games. This is based on a temporal logic that supports finite- and infinite-horizon temporal properties in both a zero-sum and nonzero-sum setting, the latter using Nash and correlated equilibria with respect to two optimality criteria, social welfare and social fairness. We summarise the key concepts, logics and algorithms and the currently available tool support. Future challenges and recent progress in adapting the framework and algorithmic solutions to continuous environments and neural networks are also outlined.","PeriodicalId":369104,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.15148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Game-theoretic concepts have been extensively studied in economics to provide insight into competitive behaviour and strategic decision making. As computing systems increasingly involve concurrently acting autonomous agents, game-theoretic approaches are becoming widespread in computer science as a faithful modelling abstraction. These techniques can be used to reason about the competitive or collaborative behaviour of multiple rational agents with distinct goals or objectives. This paper provides an overview of recent advances in developing a modelling, verification and strategy synthesis framework for concurrent stochastic games implemented in the probabilistic model checker PRISM-games. This is based on a temporal logic that supports finite- and infinite-horizon temporal properties in both a zero-sum and nonzero-sum setting, the latter using Nash and correlated equilibria with respect to two optimality criteria, social welfare and social fairness. We summarise the key concepts, logics and algorithms and the currently available tool support. Future challenges and recent progress in adapting the framework and algorithmic solutions to continuous environments and neural networks are also outlined.
基于战略均衡决策的概率模型检验:进展与挑战
博弈论概念在经济学中被广泛研究,以提供对竞争行为和战略决策的洞察。随着计算系统越来越多地涉及同时行动的自主代理,博弈论方法作为一种忠实的建模抽象在计算机科学中变得广泛。这些技术可以用来推理具有不同目标的多个理性主体的竞争或合作行为。本文概述了在概率模型检查器PRISM-games中实现的并发随机博弈的建模,验证和策略综合框架的最新进展。这是基于时间逻辑,在零和和非零和设置中支持有限和无限视界时间属性,后者使用纳什均衡和相关均衡,涉及两个最优性标准,社会福利和社会公平。我们总结了关键概念、逻辑和算法以及当前可用的工具支持。在将框架和算法解决方案适应连续环境和神经网络方面,还概述了未来的挑战和最新进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信