William Cowper and the Friends in England and America

W. Comfort
{"title":"William Cowper and the Friends in England and America","authors":"W. Comfort","doi":"10.1353/qkh.1920.a399517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his rather unsympathetic study of Cowper, Walter Bagehot wrote : \" He is the one poet of a class which have no poets. In that once large and still considerable portion of the English world, which regards the exercise of the fancy and the imagination as dangerous—snares, as they speak—distracting the soul from an intense consideration of abstract doctrine, Cowper's strenuous inculcation of those doctrines has obtained for him a certain toleration. . . . Most poets must be prohibited. . . . But Cowper is a ticket-of-leave man. He has the chaplain's certificate. He has expressed himself ' with the utmost propriety/ The other imaginative criminals must be left to the fates, but he may be admitted to the sacred drawing-room, though with constant care and scrupulous surveillance.\"1 Beneath this tone of banter, Bagehot is right in his analysis of the phenomenon of Cowper's popularity with a certain class of readers. His words are particularly to be borne in mind when we come to account for the affectionate regard in which the Poet has been held by the Society of Friends. Cowper appears to have had no social contact with the Quakers of his day. There are only a few slight references to them in his Letters. When the Poet and Mrs. Unwin were preparing lodgings for the reception of Lady Hesketh in 1786, a Quaker family in Olney rendered some assistance that was appreciated. Mrs. Unwin was conferring on the subject with one Maurice Smith, when his wife called out, \"Why dost thee not take the vicarage? . . . We will furnish it for thee, and at the lowest rate; from a bed to a platter we will find all.\" A little later, on June 12, 1786, he again wrote to his cousin: \"My friend the Quaker, in all that I have seen of his doings, has acquitted himself much to my satisfaction. Some little things, he says, will perhaps be missing at first, in such a multiplicity, but they shall","PeriodicalId":206864,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Friends' Historical Society of Philadelphia","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1920-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Friends' Historical Society of Philadelphia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/qkh.1920.a399517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his rather unsympathetic study of Cowper, Walter Bagehot wrote : " He is the one poet of a class which have no poets. In that once large and still considerable portion of the English world, which regards the exercise of the fancy and the imagination as dangerous—snares, as they speak—distracting the soul from an intense consideration of abstract doctrine, Cowper's strenuous inculcation of those doctrines has obtained for him a certain toleration. . . . Most poets must be prohibited. . . . But Cowper is a ticket-of-leave man. He has the chaplain's certificate. He has expressed himself ' with the utmost propriety/ The other imaginative criminals must be left to the fates, but he may be admitted to the sacred drawing-room, though with constant care and scrupulous surveillance."1 Beneath this tone of banter, Bagehot is right in his analysis of the phenomenon of Cowper's popularity with a certain class of readers. His words are particularly to be borne in mind when we come to account for the affectionate regard in which the Poet has been held by the Society of Friends. Cowper appears to have had no social contact with the Quakers of his day. There are only a few slight references to them in his Letters. When the Poet and Mrs. Unwin were preparing lodgings for the reception of Lady Hesketh in 1786, a Quaker family in Olney rendered some assistance that was appreciated. Mrs. Unwin was conferring on the subject with one Maurice Smith, when his wife called out, "Why dost thee not take the vicarage? . . . We will furnish it for thee, and at the lowest rate; from a bed to a platter we will find all." A little later, on June 12, 1786, he again wrote to his cousin: "My friend the Quaker, in all that I have seen of his doings, has acquitted himself much to my satisfaction. Some little things, he says, will perhaps be missing at first, in such a multiplicity, but they shall
威廉·考伯和他的朋友们在英国和美国
沃尔特·白芝浩(Walter Bagehot)在对古柏颇为冷漠的研究中写道:“他是一个没有诗人的阶级中的唯一诗人。在英国世界中,曾经有很大一部分人认为运用想象力和想象力是危险的陷阱,正如他们所说的那样,会使灵魂从对抽象教义的认真思考中分心,因此,考伯对这些教义的大力灌输为他赢得了一定的容忍. . . .大多数诗人必须被禁止. . . .但考伯是一个请假的人。他有牧师证书。他说:“其他想象中的罪犯只能听天由命了,但他可以被允许进入神圣的客厅,尽管要经常小心翼翼地监视。”在这种戏谑的语气之下,白杰特对考伯在某一类读者中受欢迎现象的分析是正确的。当我们谈到友会对诗人的深情关怀时,尤其要记住他的话。考伯似乎与他那个时代的贵格会没有任何社会联系。在他的书信中,只有几处提到他们。1786年,当诗人和昂温夫人为接待赫斯基夫人准备住所时,奥尔尼的一个贵格会家庭提供了一些帮助,他们对此表示感谢。安温太太正在和一个叫莫里斯·史密斯的人讨论这个问题时,他的妻子喊道:“你为什么不住牧师住宅?……我们将以最低的价格为你提供它;从床到盘子,我们都能找到。”不久之后,在1786年6月12日,他再次写信给他的表弟:“我的朋友贵格会教徒,在我所看到的他的所作所为中,表现得非常令人满意。他说,在这样的多样性中,一开始也许会遗漏一些小事,但它们是会遗漏的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信