Needs vs. Aspirations in Inter-Agency IT Alignment The case of IT for integrated criminal justice systems in Indonesia

Haemiwan Z. Fathony, B. Nazief, Q. Munajat
{"title":"Needs vs. Aspirations in Inter-Agency IT Alignment The case of IT for integrated criminal justice systems in Indonesia","authors":"Haemiwan Z. Fathony, B. Nazief, Q. Munajat","doi":"10.1109/ICSTC.2018.8528621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inter-organizational IT/IS implementation must deal not only with the technical complexities across different systems, but also the alignment between strategies and expected functionalities between the involved institutions. This paper aims to uncover the aspirational requirements in the implementation of integrated criminal justice systems (ICJS) in Indonesia. It involved four main agencies: police, prosecutor office, court, and prison, as well as some auxiliary agencies. The research is contrasting the aspiration-based design with rational alignment needs as defined in the classic Strategic Alignment Model. The extension of this classic IT alignment framework provides the inter-relationship discourses between business strategy, business infrastructure, technology strategy, and technology infrastructure in the inter-organizational context. This paper found out that multi-organizational IT alignment framework not always suitable in multi-organizational IT implementation. Improving the alignment inside the respective organization may be provide better answer to address the misaligned situation. This paper also found out that a narrow-focused aspiration should be catered to reach the immediate success.","PeriodicalId":196768,"journal":{"name":"2018 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTC.2018.8528621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Inter-organizational IT/IS implementation must deal not only with the technical complexities across different systems, but also the alignment between strategies and expected functionalities between the involved institutions. This paper aims to uncover the aspirational requirements in the implementation of integrated criminal justice systems (ICJS) in Indonesia. It involved four main agencies: police, prosecutor office, court, and prison, as well as some auxiliary agencies. The research is contrasting the aspiration-based design with rational alignment needs as defined in the classic Strategic Alignment Model. The extension of this classic IT alignment framework provides the inter-relationship discourses between business strategy, business infrastructure, technology strategy, and technology infrastructure in the inter-organizational context. This paper found out that multi-organizational IT alignment framework not always suitable in multi-organizational IT implementation. Improving the alignment inside the respective organization may be provide better answer to address the misaligned situation. This paper also found out that a narrow-focused aspiration should be catered to reach the immediate success.
机构间信息技术协调的需求与愿望印度尼西亚综合刑事司法系统的信息技术案例
组织间的IT/IS实现不仅要处理跨不同系统的技术复杂性,还要处理相关机构之间的策略和预期功能之间的一致性。本文旨在揭示在印度尼西亚实施综合刑事司法系统(ICJS)的期望要求。它涉及四个主要机构:警察、检察官办公室、法院和监狱,以及一些辅助机构。本研究将基于愿望的设计与经典战略结盟模型中定义的理性结盟需求进行对比。这个经典IT一致性框架的扩展提供了组织间上下文中业务策略、业务基础设施、技术策略和技术基础设施之间的相互关系话语。本文发现,多组织IT一致性框架并不总是适用于多组织IT实施。改进各自组织内部的一致性可能是解决不一致情况的更好答案。本文还发现,要想获得立竿见影的成功,就必须满足狭隘的抱负。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信