The Study of Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and Weighted Extreme Learning Machine for Handling Imbalance Problem on Multiclass Microarray classification

Khadijah, S. Endah, R. Kusumaningrum, Rismiyati
{"title":"The Study of Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and Weighted Extreme Learning Machine for Handling Imbalance Problem on Multiclass Microarray classification","authors":"Khadijah, S. Endah, R. Kusumaningrum, Rismiyati","doi":"10.1109/ICICOS.2018.8621657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microarray data classification has a great challenge due to number of samples which is much smaller compared to the number of genes. The problem is getting harder when the dataset has multiclass target and the number of samples in each class is not well distributed (which is called imbalance data distribution). In this research, two different approaches to handle imbalance data distribution are studied, they are SMOTE (based on data approach) and weighted ELM (based on algorithmic approach). To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, two public imbalanced multiclass microarray dataset are used, GCM (Global Cancer Map) and Subtypes-Leukemia dataset. The results of experiment show that the implementation of SMOTE and weighted ELM on GCM dataset have no significant effect in the classification performance. Different with the Subtypes-Leukemia dataset, the implementation of SMOTE and weighted ELM has improved the classification performance compared to the previous research. Generally, the results show that weighted ELM perform slightly better compared to SMOTE to increase the accuracy of the minority class.","PeriodicalId":438473,"journal":{"name":"2018 2nd International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS)","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 2nd International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICOS.2018.8621657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Microarray data classification has a great challenge due to number of samples which is much smaller compared to the number of genes. The problem is getting harder when the dataset has multiclass target and the number of samples in each class is not well distributed (which is called imbalance data distribution). In this research, two different approaches to handle imbalance data distribution are studied, they are SMOTE (based on data approach) and weighted ELM (based on algorithmic approach). To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, two public imbalanced multiclass microarray dataset are used, GCM (Global Cancer Map) and Subtypes-Leukemia dataset. The results of experiment show that the implementation of SMOTE and weighted ELM on GCM dataset have no significant effect in the classification performance. Different with the Subtypes-Leukemia dataset, the implementation of SMOTE and weighted ELM has improved the classification performance compared to the previous research. Generally, the results show that weighted ELM perform slightly better compared to SMOTE to increase the accuracy of the minority class.
综合少数派过采样技术和加权极值学习机处理多类微阵列分类不平衡问题的研究
由于样本数量远小于基因数量,微阵列数据分类具有很大的挑战。当数据集具有多类目标并且每个类中的样本数量分布不好(称为不平衡数据分布)时,问题变得更加困难。本文研究了两种不同的处理不平衡数据分布的方法,即SMOTE(基于数据方法)和加权ELM(基于算法方法)。为了评估该方法的性能,使用了两个公开的不平衡多类微阵列数据集,GCM (Global Cancer Map)和Subtypes-Leukemia数据集。实验结果表明,在GCM数据集上实现SMOTE和加权ELM对分类性能没有显著影响。与Subtypes-Leukemia数据集不同,SMOTE和加权ELM的实现比以往的研究提高了分类性能。通常,结果表明加权ELM比SMOTE在提高少数类别的准确性方面表现略好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信