A Feminist History of Violence against Women and the LGBTQIA+ Community in Chile, 1964–2018

Hillary Hiner
{"title":"A Feminist History of Violence against Women and the LGBTQIA+ Community in Chile, 1964–2018","authors":"Hillary Hiner","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.013.665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From a historical perspective, violence against women and the LGBTQIA+ community (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, intersex, asexual, and “+” for other possible associated identities) in Chile has presented itself and been understood in different ways. On the one hand, we have to take into consideration what Maria Lugones has named the “coloniality of gender” and how racism, sexism, and heteronormativity was installed from the colonial period onward, promoting specific violences against indigenous, black, lesbian, and trans women. Additionally, for a great deal of time, from roughly the colonial period until the 1990s, it was considered completely acceptable to use violence in the family and in intimate partner relationships to “correct” and punish women and girls. The Pinochet dictatorship (1973–1990) also adds another dimension to this discussion, as women were affected by gendered and sexualized state terrorism. However, the reappearance of strong women’s and feminist groups during the dictatorship also signaled a profound questioning of these types of gender violence, linking it to patriarchal structures and the need for democracy “in the country” and “in the home.” A similar effect was achieved by the emergence of LGBTQIA+ groups from the 1980s on, as they questioned the historic violence, hate crimes, and discrimination against gay men, lesbians, and, more recently, trans people. In both cases, then, pressures from social movement groups have forced the post-dictatorship Chilean state to pass laws and promote anti-violence public policy. For better and for worse, however, those anti-violence initiatives that have been most successful, in terms of visibility and public policy coverage, have generally centered on violences experienced by white-mestiza, cishet, urban women, particularly those that survive family violence. Historiographies on violence against women and the LGBTQIA+ community are relatively scarce, although there has been increased production in the last ten years, especially around the topics of women survivors of family or intimate partner violence and women survivors of torture and political prison.","PeriodicalId":190332,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History","volume":"51 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.013.665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

From a historical perspective, violence against women and the LGBTQIA+ community (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, intersex, asexual, and “+” for other possible associated identities) in Chile has presented itself and been understood in different ways. On the one hand, we have to take into consideration what Maria Lugones has named the “coloniality of gender” and how racism, sexism, and heteronormativity was installed from the colonial period onward, promoting specific violences against indigenous, black, lesbian, and trans women. Additionally, for a great deal of time, from roughly the colonial period until the 1990s, it was considered completely acceptable to use violence in the family and in intimate partner relationships to “correct” and punish women and girls. The Pinochet dictatorship (1973–1990) also adds another dimension to this discussion, as women were affected by gendered and sexualized state terrorism. However, the reappearance of strong women’s and feminist groups during the dictatorship also signaled a profound questioning of these types of gender violence, linking it to patriarchal structures and the need for democracy “in the country” and “in the home.” A similar effect was achieved by the emergence of LGBTQIA+ groups from the 1980s on, as they questioned the historic violence, hate crimes, and discrimination against gay men, lesbians, and, more recently, trans people. In both cases, then, pressures from social movement groups have forced the post-dictatorship Chilean state to pass laws and promote anti-violence public policy. For better and for worse, however, those anti-violence initiatives that have been most successful, in terms of visibility and public policy coverage, have generally centered on violences experienced by white-mestiza, cishet, urban women, particularly those that survive family violence. Historiographies on violence against women and the LGBTQIA+ community are relatively scarce, although there has been increased production in the last ten years, especially around the topics of women survivors of family or intimate partner violence and women survivors of torture and political prison.
女权主义史:1964-2018年智利对女性和LGBTQIA+群体的暴力行为
从历史的角度来看,智利对妇女和LGBTQIA+群体(女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿、双性恋、无性恋和其他可能相关身份的“+”)的暴力行为以不同的方式呈现和理解。一方面,我们必须考虑玛丽亚·卢戈内斯(Maria lugoones)所说的“性别的殖民性”,以及种族主义、性别歧视和异性恋规范是如何从殖民时期开始安装的,促进了对土著、黑人、女同性恋和变性妇女的具体暴力。此外,在相当长的一段时间内,大约从殖民时期到1990年代,人们认为在家庭和亲密伴侣关系中使用暴力来“纠正”和惩罚妇女和女孩是完全可以接受的。皮诺切特的独裁统治(1973-1990)也为这一讨论增加了另一个维度,因为女性受到性别化和性别化的国家恐怖主义的影响。然而,在独裁统治期间,强大的女性和女权主义团体的重新出现也标志着对这些类型的性别暴力的深刻质疑,将其与父权结构和“在国家”和“在家里”的民主需求联系起来。从20世纪80年代开始,LGBTQIA+团体的出现也取得了类似的效果,他们质疑历史上的暴力、仇恨犯罪以及对男女同性恋者的歧视,以及最近对变性人的歧视。在这两种情况下,来自社会运动团体的压力迫使后独裁统治的智利政府通过法律,促进反暴力的公共政策。然而,不管是好是坏,那些在能见度和公共政策报道方面最成功的反暴力倡议,通常都集中在白人混血儿、黑人、城市妇女所遭受的暴力上,尤其是那些在家庭暴力中幸存下来的妇女。关于暴力侵害妇女和LGBTQIA+社区的历史编纂相对较少,尽管在过去十年中产量有所增加,特别是围绕家庭或亲密伴侣暴力的女性幸存者以及酷刑和政治监狱的女性幸存者的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信