A Metaphorical Analysis of Giftedness and Inclusive Education for Pre- Service Teachers

Elham Zarfsaz, Serpil Uçar, Güliz Kaymakci
{"title":"A Metaphorical Analysis of Giftedness and Inclusive Education for Pre- Service Teachers","authors":"Elham Zarfsaz, Serpil Uçar, Güliz Kaymakci","doi":"10.47503/jirss.1210780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of present study is to ascertain how prospective pre-service teachers see the notions of Gifted student and Inclusive Education. The study was carried out with 92 pre-service teachers studying in Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University Education Faculty, Department of foreign languages and science education during the academic year 2022–2023. This study is descriptive since it tries to present the current condition. The metaphors created by pre-service teachers were examined and commented upon within this framework in five steps: Identifying metaphors, categorizing metaphors, creating categories, assessing validity and reliability, and transferring quantitative data into the SPSS package program are the first three steps. To learn the pre-service teachers' opinions regarding the chosen ideas, a form with two open-ended questions was employed as a data collection instrument. In the questionnaire, the questions \"A gifted student is like...... because......\" and \"Inclusive Education is like...... because......\" were to be answered by the participants. Through the use of content analysis, the survey question data was examined. The lists of metaphors and categories were distributed to three faculty members who are authorities in the subject of study in order to assess the accuracy of the metaphors identified as a consequence of the analysis and the categories derived from them. Following the expert opinions, the non-overlapping metaphors were discussed in order to determine the final metaphors and categories for the study. It was concluded as a result that pre-service teachers created 92 valid metaphors for the idea of giftedness and inclusive education. As a result, it was discovered that pre-service teachers had positive opinions of the term \"giftedness,\" additionally, they also created some favorable metaphors for the inclusive education.","PeriodicalId":369190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovative Research in Social Studies","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovative Research in Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47503/jirss.1210780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of present study is to ascertain how prospective pre-service teachers see the notions of Gifted student and Inclusive Education. The study was carried out with 92 pre-service teachers studying in Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University Education Faculty, Department of foreign languages and science education during the academic year 2022–2023. This study is descriptive since it tries to present the current condition. The metaphors created by pre-service teachers were examined and commented upon within this framework in five steps: Identifying metaphors, categorizing metaphors, creating categories, assessing validity and reliability, and transferring quantitative data into the SPSS package program are the first three steps. To learn the pre-service teachers' opinions regarding the chosen ideas, a form with two open-ended questions was employed as a data collection instrument. In the questionnaire, the questions "A gifted student is like...... because......" and "Inclusive Education is like...... because......" were to be answered by the participants. Through the use of content analysis, the survey question data was examined. The lists of metaphors and categories were distributed to three faculty members who are authorities in the subject of study in order to assess the accuracy of the metaphors identified as a consequence of the analysis and the categories derived from them. Following the expert opinions, the non-overlapping metaphors were discussed in order to determine the final metaphors and categories for the study. It was concluded as a result that pre-service teachers created 92 valid metaphors for the idea of giftedness and inclusive education. As a result, it was discovered that pre-service teachers had positive opinions of the term "giftedness," additionally, they also created some favorable metaphors for the inclusive education.
职前教师资优与全纳教育之隐喻分析
本研究旨在探讨职前教师对资优学生及全纳教育概念的看法。该研究是在2022-2023学年期间在Tokat Gaziosmanpasa大学教育学院外语和科学教育系学习的92名职前教师中进行的。这项研究是描述性的,因为它试图呈现当前的状况。职前教师创造的隐喻在这个框架内分为五个步骤进行检查和评论:识别隐喻,对隐喻进行分类,创建类别,评估效度和信度,将定量数据转移到SPSS软件包程序是前三个步骤。为了了解职前教师对所选理念的看法,采用了一个带有两个开放式问题的表格作为数据收集工具。在问卷中,“天才学生就像......。因为......”和“全纳教育就像......因为......”是由参与者回答的。通过运用内容分析法,对调查问题数据进行检验。这些隐喻和类别的清单被分发给三名在该研究领域具有权威地位的教员,以评估通过分析确定的隐喻和由此衍生的类别的准确性。根据专家意见,对非重叠隐喻进行了讨论,以确定研究的最终隐喻和类别。结果表明,职前教师创造了92个有效的隐喻来表达天赋和全纳教育的概念。结果发现,职前教师对“天赋”一词持肯定态度,此外,他们还创造了一些有利于全纳教育的隐喻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信