Quantitative evaluation method of image segmentation techniques for Magnetic Resonance guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound therapy

V. Rincon-Montes, A. Vargas-Olivares, S. Pichardo, L. Curiel, J. E. Chong-Quero
{"title":"Quantitative evaluation method of image segmentation techniques for Magnetic Resonance guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound therapy","authors":"V. Rincon-Montes, A. Vargas-Olivares, S. Pichardo, L. Curiel, J. E. Chong-Quero","doi":"10.1109/ICEEE.2013.6676044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes a quantitative evaluation method for the accuracy of two different segmentation techniques for the treatment planning of Magnetic Resonance guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgHIFU). The first technique is a combination of image segmentation methods consisting of Otsu's method, global, edge detection with Laplacian of Gaussian method, region growing algorithm and variable thresholding method. The second technique is a combination of image segmentation methods consisting of Otsu's method and the selection of regions using variable thresholding. These methods were used to classify the pixels of real Magnetic Resonance (MR) images obtained for the study of the distribution of heat in abscess treatment in a murine model with High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU). In the evaluation, a total of nine surveys of 48 images each were used, and a methodology including three main steps was followed: establishment of ground truth images and calculation of areas from the segmented images, discrepancy measure calculation, and data normalization. For the evaluation an area-based metric was used and it was based on a discrepancy measure proposed for two regions and on the generalized version for c regions. After the evaluation of both segmentation techniques it was found that they presented a better performance in axial MR images than in sagittal MR images. In sagittal MR images, the average error and standard deviation error measures indicated a high variability in the segmentation for both techniques. Due to the performance of the segmentation for sagittal images, improvements will be implemented taking into account the combination of the evaluated methods in order to exploit the benefits of each one.","PeriodicalId":226547,"journal":{"name":"2013 10th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 10th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEE.2013.6676044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper describes a quantitative evaluation method for the accuracy of two different segmentation techniques for the treatment planning of Magnetic Resonance guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgHIFU). The first technique is a combination of image segmentation methods consisting of Otsu's method, global, edge detection with Laplacian of Gaussian method, region growing algorithm and variable thresholding method. The second technique is a combination of image segmentation methods consisting of Otsu's method and the selection of regions using variable thresholding. These methods were used to classify the pixels of real Magnetic Resonance (MR) images obtained for the study of the distribution of heat in abscess treatment in a murine model with High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU). In the evaluation, a total of nine surveys of 48 images each were used, and a methodology including three main steps was followed: establishment of ground truth images and calculation of areas from the segmented images, discrepancy measure calculation, and data normalization. For the evaluation an area-based metric was used and it was based on a discrepancy measure proposed for two regions and on the generalized version for c regions. After the evaluation of both segmentation techniques it was found that they presented a better performance in axial MR images than in sagittal MR images. In sagittal MR images, the average error and standard deviation error measures indicated a high variability in the segmentation for both techniques. Due to the performance of the segmentation for sagittal images, improvements will be implemented taking into account the combination of the evaluated methods in order to exploit the benefits of each one.
磁共振引导高强度聚焦超声治疗图像分割技术的定量评价方法
本文描述了一种定量评价磁共振引导高强度聚焦超声(MRgHIFU)治疗计划中两种不同分割技术准确性的方法。第一种方法是结合了Otsu方法、拉普拉斯高斯边缘检测方法、区域生长算法和变量阈值分割方法等图像分割方法。第二种方法是结合Otsu方法和使用可变阈值选择区域的图像分割方法。利用这些方法对获得的真实磁共振(MR)图像像素进行分类,用于研究高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)治疗小鼠模型脓肿过程中的热分布。在评估中,总共使用了9个调查,每个调查48张图像,并遵循了一个方法,包括三个主要步骤:建立地面真值图像并从分割图像中计算面积,差异度量计算和数据归一化。对于评估,使用了基于区域的度量,它基于两个区域提出的差异度量和c区域的广义版本。在对两种分割技术进行评估后,发现它们在轴向MR图像中比在矢状MR图像中表现出更好的性能。在矢状面MR图像中,平均误差和标准偏差误差测量表明,这两种技术的分割具有很高的可变性。由于矢状面图像分割的性能,为了利用每一种方法的优点,将考虑到评估方法的组合进行改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信