Does a difference in ice sheets between Marine Isotope Stages 3 and 5a affect the duration of stadials?

S. Sherriff-Tadano, A. Abe‐Ouchi, A. Oka, Takahito Mitsui, F. Saito
{"title":"Does a difference in ice sheets between Marine Isotope Stages 3 and 5a affect the duration of stadials?","authors":"S. Sherriff-Tadano, A. Abe‐Ouchi, A. Oka, Takahito Mitsui, F. Saito","doi":"10.5194/CP-2021-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Glacial periods undergo frequent climate shifts between warm interstadials and cold stadials on a millennial time-scale. Recent studies have shown that the duration of these climate modes varies with the background climate; a colder background climate and lower CO2 generally results in a shorter interstadial and a longer stadial through its impact on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). However, the duration of stadials was shorter during the Marine Isotope Stage 3 (MIS3) compared with MIS5, despite the colder climate in MIS3, suggesting potential control from other climate factors on the duration of stadials. In this study, we investigated the role of glacial ice sheets. For this purpose, freshwater hosing experiments were conducted with an atmosphere–ocean general circulation model under MIS5a, MIS3 and MIS3 with MIS5a ice sheet conditions. The impact of ice sheet differences on the duration of the stadials was evaluated by comparing recovery times of the AMOC after freshwater forcing was reduced. Hosing experiments showed a slightly shorter recovery time of the AMOC in MIS3 compared with MIS5a, which was consistent with ice core data. We found that larger glacial ice sheets in MIS3 shortened the recovery time. Sensitivity experiments showed that stronger surface winds over the North Atlantic shortened the recovery time by increasing the surface salinity and decreasing the sea ice amount in the deepwater formation region, which set favourable conditions for oceanic convection. In contrast, we also found that surface cooling by larger ice sheets tended to increase the recovery time of the AMOC by increasing the sea ice thickness over the deepwater formation region. Thus, this study suggests that the larger ice sheet in MIS3 compared with MIS5a could have contributed to the shortening of stadials in MIS3, despite the climate being colder than that of MIS5a, when the effect of surface wind played a larger role.\n","PeriodicalId":263057,"journal":{"name":"Climate of The Past Discussions","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate of The Past Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/CP-2021-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Glacial periods undergo frequent climate shifts between warm interstadials and cold stadials on a millennial time-scale. Recent studies have shown that the duration of these climate modes varies with the background climate; a colder background climate and lower CO2 generally results in a shorter interstadial and a longer stadial through its impact on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). However, the duration of stadials was shorter during the Marine Isotope Stage 3 (MIS3) compared with MIS5, despite the colder climate in MIS3, suggesting potential control from other climate factors on the duration of stadials. In this study, we investigated the role of glacial ice sheets. For this purpose, freshwater hosing experiments were conducted with an atmosphere–ocean general circulation model under MIS5a, MIS3 and MIS3 with MIS5a ice sheet conditions. The impact of ice sheet differences on the duration of the stadials was evaluated by comparing recovery times of the AMOC after freshwater forcing was reduced. Hosing experiments showed a slightly shorter recovery time of the AMOC in MIS3 compared with MIS5a, which was consistent with ice core data. We found that larger glacial ice sheets in MIS3 shortened the recovery time. Sensitivity experiments showed that stronger surface winds over the North Atlantic shortened the recovery time by increasing the surface salinity and decreasing the sea ice amount in the deepwater formation region, which set favourable conditions for oceanic convection. In contrast, we also found that surface cooling by larger ice sheets tended to increase the recovery time of the AMOC by increasing the sea ice thickness over the deepwater formation region. Thus, this study suggests that the larger ice sheet in MIS3 compared with MIS5a could have contributed to the shortening of stadials in MIS3, despite the climate being colder than that of MIS5a, when the effect of surface wind played a larger role.
海洋同位素阶段3和5a之间冰盖的差异是否会影响冰期的持续时间?
摘要在千年的时间尺度上,冰期经历了温暖间冰期和寒冷间冰期之间频繁的气候变化。最近的研究表明,这些气候模态的持续时间随背景气候而变化;较冷的背景气候和较低的CO2通过其对大西洋经向翻转环流(AMOC)的影响,通常导致较短的静时间隔和较长的静时间隔。然而,尽管MIS3阶段的气候较冷,但与MIS5阶段相比,MIS3阶段的间歇期持续时间较短,这表明其他气候因素可能对间歇期的持续时间有控制作用。在这项研究中,我们研究了冰川冰盖的作用。为此,在MIS5a、MIS3和MIS3冰盖条件下的大气-海洋环流模式下进行了淡水软管实验。通过比较淡水强迫减少后AMOC的恢复时间,评估了冰盖差异对冰期持续时间的影响。与MIS5a相比,MIS3的AMOC恢复时间略短,这与冰芯数据一致。我们发现MIS3的大冰原缩短了恢复时间。敏感性实验表明,北大西洋上空较强的地面风通过增加表层盐度和减少深水地层区海冰量缩短了恢复时间,为海洋对流创造了有利条件。相比之下,我们还发现,更大冰盖的表面冷却往往会通过增加深水地层区域的海冰厚度来延长AMOC的恢复时间。因此,本研究提示,尽管MIS3的气候比MIS5a更冷,但MIS3的冰盖比MIS5a更大,地表风的作用更大,可能导致MIS3的冰期缩短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信