THE NATIONAL QUESTION AS A FACTOR OF THE COLLAPSE OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE. LATVIA AND ESTONIA ON THE ROAD TO INDEPENDENCE. 1914–17

Evgeniia Nazarova
{"title":"THE NATIONAL QUESTION AS A FACTOR OF THE COLLAPSE OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE. LATVIA AND ESTONIA ON THE ROAD TO INDEPENDENCE. 1914–17","authors":"Evgeniia Nazarova","doi":"10.15393/j103.art.2018.1121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first part of the article outlines the 1914–17 discussion on establishing national autonomies in the non-Russian regions of the Empire when the WWI made the national question extremely urgent both for the central government and national elites. After the collapse of the Empire the Provisional Government did not work out any general programme for solving the problem. The second part analyses the activity of Latvian and Estonian national-democratic leaders for solving the national question in their respective regions. They presented their projects of establishing national autonomies based on democratic principles to the Provisional Government in spring 1917. Although the latter did not approve these programmes in full, the elected National Land Councils started corresponding reforms, while the Bolsheviks who were also present in these Councils made efforts to undermine the creation of autonomies. When Russia was proclaimed the democratic state on September 1 (13), 1917, the federative form of the state was not declared. But despite growing tendency to independence, establishing national autonomies within a Russian Democratic Federal Republic to be proclaimed by the All-Russian Constituent Assembly remained more attractive perspective for the Latvians and Estonians. The dissolution of the Constituent Assembly in January, 1918 marked the end of the hopes for national autonomies within the Russian Democratic Federal Republic. Still, the formation of the Soviet Federative State in spite of the Bolsheviks’ previous idea of a unitary proletarian republic, indicated that the Communist authorities had to take into account the peoples’ desire for national autonomies. This fact highlights the missed opportunities for the Provisional Government to save the project of the Russian democratic state. Ключевые слова /","PeriodicalId":431223,"journal":{"name":"Nordic and Baltic Studies Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic and Baltic Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15393/j103.art.2018.1121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The first part of the article outlines the 1914–17 discussion on establishing national autonomies in the non-Russian regions of the Empire when the WWI made the national question extremely urgent both for the central government and national elites. After the collapse of the Empire the Provisional Government did not work out any general programme for solving the problem. The second part analyses the activity of Latvian and Estonian national-democratic leaders for solving the national question in their respective regions. They presented their projects of establishing national autonomies based on democratic principles to the Provisional Government in spring 1917. Although the latter did not approve these programmes in full, the elected National Land Councils started corresponding reforms, while the Bolsheviks who were also present in these Councils made efforts to undermine the creation of autonomies. When Russia was proclaimed the democratic state on September 1 (13), 1917, the federative form of the state was not declared. But despite growing tendency to independence, establishing national autonomies within a Russian Democratic Federal Republic to be proclaimed by the All-Russian Constituent Assembly remained more attractive perspective for the Latvians and Estonians. The dissolution of the Constituent Assembly in January, 1918 marked the end of the hopes for national autonomies within the Russian Democratic Federal Republic. Still, the formation of the Soviet Federative State in spite of the Bolsheviks’ previous idea of a unitary proletarian republic, indicated that the Communist authorities had to take into account the peoples’ desire for national autonomies. This fact highlights the missed opportunities for the Provisional Government to save the project of the Russian democratic state. Ключевые слова /
民族问题是导致俄罗斯帝国崩溃的一个因素。拉脱维亚和爱沙尼亚正在走向独立。1914 - 17
文章的第一部分概述了1914年至1917年关于在帝国的非俄罗斯地区建立民族自治的讨论,当时第一次世界大战使中央政府和民族精英都迫切需要解决民族问题。帝国崩溃后,临时政府没有制定任何解决问题的总体方案。第二部分分析了拉脱维亚和爱沙尼亚民族民主领导人为解决其各自区域的民族问题所进行的活动。1917年春,他们向临时政府提出了建立基于民主原则的民族自治的计划。虽然后者没有完全批准这些计划,但当选的全国土地委员会开始了相应的改革,而布尔什维克也出现在这些委员会中,他们努力破坏自治的建立。1917年9月1日(13日)俄国宣布成为民主国家时,并没有宣布国家的联邦制形式。但是,尽管独立的趋势日益增长,在一个由全俄制宪会议宣布的俄罗斯民主联邦共和国内建立民族自治对拉脱维亚人和爱沙尼亚人来说仍然是更有吸引力的前景。1918年1月制宪会议的解散标志着俄罗斯民主联邦共和国内部民族自治的希望的终结。然而,尽管布尔什维克先前的想法是建立一个统一的无产阶级共和国,苏维埃联邦国家的形成表明共产党当局必须考虑到人民对民族自治的愿望。这一事实凸显了临时政府错过了挽救俄国民主国家计划的机会。Ключевые слова /
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信