Simple is Good: Observations of Visualization Use Amongst the Big Data Digerati

D. Russell
{"title":"Simple is Good: Observations of Visualization Use Amongst the Big Data Digerati","authors":"D. Russell","doi":"10.1145/2909132.2933287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While modern information visualization (IV) has been around for several decades, the inventions of IV seem to be peripheral to the everyday work in companies that would seem to be the most likely to use these inventions. In this case study, Google uses very few IV tools, relying mostly on more traditional ways of looking at data and data relationships. What has brought about this state of affairs? An analysis shows that the basic causes of low adoption are (a) difficulty of data wrangling and sharing the work products of analysis, (b) the need to share a common visual language literacy across different parts of the organization, (c) problems in using IV tools to communicate and present complex data analyses. At the same time, IV technology is found to be more useful in the investigation phase of research, rather than for communication and presentation reasons.","PeriodicalId":250565,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2909132.2933287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

While modern information visualization (IV) has been around for several decades, the inventions of IV seem to be peripheral to the everyday work in companies that would seem to be the most likely to use these inventions. In this case study, Google uses very few IV tools, relying mostly on more traditional ways of looking at data and data relationships. What has brought about this state of affairs? An analysis shows that the basic causes of low adoption are (a) difficulty of data wrangling and sharing the work products of analysis, (b) the need to share a common visual language literacy across different parts of the organization, (c) problems in using IV tools to communicate and present complex data analyses. At the same time, IV technology is found to be more useful in the investigation phase of research, rather than for communication and presentation reasons.
简单即是好:大数据数字化人士对可视化使用的观察
虽然现代信息可视化(IV)已经存在了几十年,但IV的发明似乎是最有可能使用这些发明的公司的日常工作的外围。在这个案例研究中,谷歌很少使用IV工具,主要依靠更传统的方式来看待数据和数据关系。是什么导致了这种状况?一项分析表明,低采用率的基本原因是(a)数据整理和共享分析工作产品的困难,(b)需要在组织的不同部分共享共同的视觉语言素养,(c)在使用IV工具进行交流和呈现复杂数据分析方面存在问题。同时,发现IV技术在研究的调查阶段更有用,而不是用于沟通和演示原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信