Restructured Electric Power Systems: Operation, Trading, and Volatility [Book Review]

M. Shahidehpour, M. Alomoush
{"title":"Restructured Electric Power Systems: Operation, Trading, and Volatility [Book Review]","authors":"M. Shahidehpour, M. Alomoush","doi":"10.1109/MCAP.2002.993762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The electric power industry is in the midst of a major restructuring in which electric energy would be traded as a commodity, electric power markets would foster open access to all suppliers of electric power, discrimination against any user of the transmission system would be reduced or eliminated, a competitive wholesale market at the national level would be fostered to reduce prices, and a competitive retail market at the state level would be encouraged to provide customer choice and competition in service and reliability. Ultimately, small customers will be able to choose their electric supplier much as they currently select their long-distance telephone carrier. For decades the electric utilities monopolized the way power was generated, transmitted, and distributed to customers in their service territories. Utilities were vertically integrated and provided generation, transmitted power in bulk from generating stations to load centers, and distributed power to customers. Although these three components remained the same, where restructuring brought on by deregulation has occurred, the three services were unbundled. Furthermore, coordination and rules were established to guarantee competition and nondiscriminatory open access to all users in the interconnection. These changes were brought about by a series of FERC Orders that progressively changed the environment in response to how the industry responded and how FERC felt it measured up to its objectives for a competitive, efficient marketplace. The energy shortages and rolling blackouts in California and elsewhere suggest that the evolution from a monopolistic to a competitive marketplace has not always been smooth. Restructured Electric Power Systems: Operation, Trading, and Volatility provides the reader with information without taking any position for or against any of these FERC Orders. It provides rational pro and con arguments made as these FERC Orders were discussed prior to implementation and the reasons that FERC gave for issuing the orders in their final form. The authors provide unbiased reporting of background information. Fortunately for the reader, they selected a self-consistent set of topics that could be covered in a book about operation under a restructured electric power system environment. The book covers the following developments: A competitive marketplace needed new trading-based methods for scheduling which generators and services would be provided for whom and by whom. This was carried out in detail for various restructured systems. A second level of concern existed, regarding what level of generation and what level of service each of the scheduled generators and control devices would provide based on the marketplace trading. This was also carried out for several restructured systems. The transactions and limitations of the trading marketplace-based operation process must be transparent in order to bolster customer and supplier confidence. Thus, the Open Access Same-Time Information System (OASIS), a reporting process and system, was implemented. A discussion of OASIS, the information it provides, and how it is determined is given Energy shortages or congestion in the interconnection that restrict the flow of power are two of the many previously unknown risks that can cause market volatility in a monopolistic environment. Market-based vehicles were needed and created to reduce and manage each of the risks identified. The risks and the various vehicles created to manage each risk are discussed. A comparison of the marketbased operating structures for various regions of the United States is provided, and a comparison of restructuring in several foreign countries is given in","PeriodicalId":435675,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Computer Applications in Power","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Computer Applications in Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MCAP.2002.993762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The electric power industry is in the midst of a major restructuring in which electric energy would be traded as a commodity, electric power markets would foster open access to all suppliers of electric power, discrimination against any user of the transmission system would be reduced or eliminated, a competitive wholesale market at the national level would be fostered to reduce prices, and a competitive retail market at the state level would be encouraged to provide customer choice and competition in service and reliability. Ultimately, small customers will be able to choose their electric supplier much as they currently select their long-distance telephone carrier. For decades the electric utilities monopolized the way power was generated, transmitted, and distributed to customers in their service territories. Utilities were vertically integrated and provided generation, transmitted power in bulk from generating stations to load centers, and distributed power to customers. Although these three components remained the same, where restructuring brought on by deregulation has occurred, the three services were unbundled. Furthermore, coordination and rules were established to guarantee competition and nondiscriminatory open access to all users in the interconnection. These changes were brought about by a series of FERC Orders that progressively changed the environment in response to how the industry responded and how FERC felt it measured up to its objectives for a competitive, efficient marketplace. The energy shortages and rolling blackouts in California and elsewhere suggest that the evolution from a monopolistic to a competitive marketplace has not always been smooth. Restructured Electric Power Systems: Operation, Trading, and Volatility provides the reader with information without taking any position for or against any of these FERC Orders. It provides rational pro and con arguments made as these FERC Orders were discussed prior to implementation and the reasons that FERC gave for issuing the orders in their final form. The authors provide unbiased reporting of background information. Fortunately for the reader, they selected a self-consistent set of topics that could be covered in a book about operation under a restructured electric power system environment. The book covers the following developments: A competitive marketplace needed new trading-based methods for scheduling which generators and services would be provided for whom and by whom. This was carried out in detail for various restructured systems. A second level of concern existed, regarding what level of generation and what level of service each of the scheduled generators and control devices would provide based on the marketplace trading. This was also carried out for several restructured systems. The transactions and limitations of the trading marketplace-based operation process must be transparent in order to bolster customer and supplier confidence. Thus, the Open Access Same-Time Information System (OASIS), a reporting process and system, was implemented. A discussion of OASIS, the information it provides, and how it is determined is given Energy shortages or congestion in the interconnection that restrict the flow of power are two of the many previously unknown risks that can cause market volatility in a monopolistic environment. Market-based vehicles were needed and created to reduce and manage each of the risks identified. The risks and the various vehicles created to manage each risk are discussed. A comparison of the marketbased operating structures for various regions of the United States is provided, and a comparison of restructuring in several foreign countries is given in
重组电力系统:运作、交易和波动[书评]
电力工业正在进行重大改组,其中电能将作为一种商品进行交易,电力市场将促进向所有电力供应商开放,对输电系统任何用户的歧视将减少或消除,将在国家一级培育竞争性批发市场以降低价格。鼓励在州一级建立竞争性零售市场,为客户提供选择,并在服务和可靠性方面进行竞争。最终,小客户将能够像选择长途电话运营商一样选择他们的电力供应商。几十年来,电力公司垄断了电力的产生、传输和分配给其服务区域内客户的方式。公用事业垂直整合并提供发电,将电力从发电站批量传输到负荷中心,并将电力分配给客户。虽然这三个组成部分保持不变,但在放松管制带来的重组中,这三种服务是分开的。此外,还建立了协调和规则,以保证互联中所有用户的竞争和非歧视性开放接入。这些变化是由FERC的一系列命令带来的,这些命令逐渐改变了环境,以响应行业的反应,以及FERC如何衡量其竞争,高效市场的目标。加州和其他地方的能源短缺和轮流停电表明,从垄断市场到竞争市场的演变并不总是一帆风顺的。《重组电力系统:操作、交易和波动》为读者提供信息,但不支持或反对联邦电力监管委员会的任何指令。它提供了合理的赞成和反对,因为这些FERC命令在实施之前进行了讨论,以及FERC给出的最终形式发布命令的原因。作者提供了公正的背景信息报道。对读者来说幸运的是,他们选择了一组自我一致的主题,这些主题可以在一本关于在重组电力系统环境下运行的书中涵盖。这本书涵盖了以下发展:竞争性市场需要新的基于交易的方法来安排哪些发电机和服务将为谁提供,由谁提供。对各种重组系统进行了详细的研究。第二个关切是,根据市场交易情况,每个预定的发电机和控制装置将提供何种水平的发电和服务。对几个改组后的系统也进行了这项工作。基于交易市场的操作流程的交易和限制必须是透明的,以增强客户和供应商的信心。因此,开放存取同步信息系统(OASIS),一个报告过程和系统,被实施。关于OASIS的讨论,它提供的信息,以及如何确定它是在限制电力流动的能源短缺或互联拥堵的情况下进行的,这是许多以前未知的风险中的两个,这些风险可能导致垄断环境中的市场波动。需要并创建基于市场的工具来减少和管理已确定的每一种风险。讨论了风险和为管理每种风险而创建的各种工具。对美国不同地区的市场化经营结构进行了比较,并对几个国外的重组进行了比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信