The Openness of Civil Court Proceedings in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Tomasz Tomczak
{"title":"The Openness of Civil Court Proceedings in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Tomasz Tomczak","doi":"10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.2.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the adoption of several measures to protect public health during civil trials in Poland. Some of these measures have restricted the traditionally open nature of the trial by allowing for closed hearings to be held in situations not regulated before. This study examines such situations in the light of international human rights instruments, from the dual perspectives of internal (between the parties) and external (towards third parties) openness of court hearings. It is established that such hearings do not contravene international human rights instruments pertaining to a fair trial if the restrictions are well-founded and proportional, even though some measures have to be taken in order to protect parties and third parties vulnerable to the lack of the necessary instruments or technical knowledge to attend hearings remotely. The author concludes that some restrictions to open court civil proceedings during the COVID-19 pandemic are likely to remain in place, and the possibilities of remote access may even prove beneficial in enhancing the principle of the open trial.","PeriodicalId":419539,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Legal Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47745/ausleg.2021.10.2.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the adoption of several measures to protect public health during civil trials in Poland. Some of these measures have restricted the traditionally open nature of the trial by allowing for closed hearings to be held in situations not regulated before. This study examines such situations in the light of international human rights instruments, from the dual perspectives of internal (between the parties) and external (towards third parties) openness of court hearings. It is established that such hearings do not contravene international human rights instruments pertaining to a fair trial if the restrictions are well-founded and proportional, even though some measures have to be taken in order to protect parties and third parties vulnerable to the lack of the necessary instruments or technical knowledge to attend hearings remotely. The author concludes that some restrictions to open court civil proceedings during the COVID-19 pandemic are likely to remain in place, and the possibilities of remote access may even prove beneficial in enhancing the principle of the open trial.
COVID-19大流行时期民事法院诉讼程序的公开性
由于COVID-19大流行,波兰在民事审判期间采取了若干措施来保护公众健康。其中一些措施限制了审判传统上的公开性质,允许在以前没有规定的情况下举行非公开听证会。本研究根据国际人权文书,从法庭听证的内部(当事各方之间)和外部(对第三方)公开的双重角度审查这种情况。可以确定的是,如果限制是有充分根据和适当的,这种听审并不违反有关公平审判的国际人权文书,尽管必须采取一些措施,以保护当事人和第三方,使他们容易因缺乏必要的文书或技术知识而无法远程参加听审。作者的结论是,在COVID-19大流行期间,对公开法庭民事诉讼的一些限制可能会继续存在,远程访问的可能性甚至可能有助于加强公开审判的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信