Statistical analysis of the Kumaresan-Tufts and Matrix Pencil methods in estimating a damped sinusoid

E. Djermoune, M. Tomczak
{"title":"Statistical analysis of the Kumaresan-Tufts and Matrix Pencil methods in estimating a damped sinusoid","authors":"E. Djermoune, M. Tomczak","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.38226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several methods have been developed for estimating the parameters of damped and undamped exponentials in noise, but the performances of such techniques are generally known only in the undamped case. In this paper, we consider two estimation methods: the Kumaresan-Tufts method and the Matrix Pencil approach, and we obtain their estimation performances in the case of a single exponentially damped sinusoid. Assuming a high signal-to-noise ratio, closed form expressions for the bias and the variance of the damping factor are derived. The analytical results are confirmed using Monte Carlo simulations. The analysis indicates that the Matrix Pencil method exhibits a lower variance but has a greater bias than the Kumaresan-Tufts approach.","PeriodicalId":347658,"journal":{"name":"2004 12th European Signal Processing Conference","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2004 12th European Signal Processing Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.38226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Several methods have been developed for estimating the parameters of damped and undamped exponentials in noise, but the performances of such techniques are generally known only in the undamped case. In this paper, we consider two estimation methods: the Kumaresan-Tufts method and the Matrix Pencil approach, and we obtain their estimation performances in the case of a single exponentially damped sinusoid. Assuming a high signal-to-noise ratio, closed form expressions for the bias and the variance of the damping factor are derived. The analytical results are confirmed using Monte Carlo simulations. The analysis indicates that the Matrix Pencil method exhibits a lower variance but has a greater bias than the Kumaresan-Tufts approach.
估计阻尼正弦波的kumaresantufts和矩阵铅笔方法的统计分析
已经开发了几种方法来估计噪声中阻尼和无阻尼指数的参数,但这些技术的性能通常仅在无阻尼情况下已知。本文考虑了两种估计方法:kumaresan_tufts方法和矩阵铅笔方法,并得到了它们在单指数阻尼正弦情况下的估计性能。在高信噪比条件下,导出了偏置和阻尼系数方差的封闭表达式。通过蒙特卡罗模拟验证了分析结果。分析表明,与kumaresantufts方法相比,Matrix Pencil方法的方差更小,但偏差更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信