Visualizing and Evaluating High-Dimensional Mappings of Sets of High Performance Designs

C. Morris, M. Haberman, C. Seepersad
{"title":"Visualizing and Evaluating High-Dimensional Mappings of Sets of High Performance Designs","authors":"C. Morris, M. Haberman, C. Seepersad","doi":"10.1115/detc2019-97722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Design space exploration can reveal the underlying structure of design problems. In a set-based approach, for example, exploration can map sets of designs or regions of the design space that meet specific performance requirements. For some problems, promising designs may cluster in multiple regions of the input design space, and the boundaries of those clusters may be irregularly shaped and difficult to predict. Visualizing the promising regions can clarify the design space structure, but design spaces are typically high-dimensional, making it difficult to visualize the space in three dimensions. To convey the structure of such high-dimensional design regions, a two-stage approach is proposed to (1) identify and (2) visualize each distinct cluster or region of interest in the input design space. This paper focuses on the visualization stage of the approach. Rather than select a singular technique to map high-dimensional design spaces to low-dimensional, visualizable spaces, a selection procedure is investigated. Metrics are available for comparing different visualizations, but the current metrics either overestimate the quality or favor selection of certain visualizations. Therefore, this work introduces and validates a more objective metric, termed preservation, to compare the quality of alternative visualization strategies. Furthermore, a new visualization technique previously unexplored in the design automation community, t-Distributed Neighbor Embedding, is introduced and compared to other visualization strategies. Finally, the new metric and visualization technique are integrated into a two-stage visualization strategy to identify and visualize clusters of high-performance designs for a high-dimensional negative stiffness metamaterials design problem.","PeriodicalId":365601,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2A: 45th Design Automation Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2A: 45th Design Automation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2019-97722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design space exploration can reveal the underlying structure of design problems. In a set-based approach, for example, exploration can map sets of designs or regions of the design space that meet specific performance requirements. For some problems, promising designs may cluster in multiple regions of the input design space, and the boundaries of those clusters may be irregularly shaped and difficult to predict. Visualizing the promising regions can clarify the design space structure, but design spaces are typically high-dimensional, making it difficult to visualize the space in three dimensions. To convey the structure of such high-dimensional design regions, a two-stage approach is proposed to (1) identify and (2) visualize each distinct cluster or region of interest in the input design space. This paper focuses on the visualization stage of the approach. Rather than select a singular technique to map high-dimensional design spaces to low-dimensional, visualizable spaces, a selection procedure is investigated. Metrics are available for comparing different visualizations, but the current metrics either overestimate the quality or favor selection of certain visualizations. Therefore, this work introduces and validates a more objective metric, termed preservation, to compare the quality of alternative visualization strategies. Furthermore, a new visualization technique previously unexplored in the design automation community, t-Distributed Neighbor Embedding, is introduced and compared to other visualization strategies. Finally, the new metric and visualization technique are integrated into a two-stage visualization strategy to identify and visualize clusters of high-performance designs for a high-dimensional negative stiffness metamaterials design problem.
可视化和评估高性能设计集的高维映射
设计空间探索可以揭示设计问题的深层结构。例如,在基于集合的方法中,探索可以映射满足特定性能需求的设计集或设计空间的区域。对于某些问题,有前途的设计可能会聚集在输入设计空间的多个区域,这些集群的边界可能是不规则的,难以预测。可视化有希望的区域可以澄清设计空间结构,但设计空间通常是高维的,很难在三维空间中可视化。为了传达这种高维设计区域的结构,提出了一种两阶段的方法:(1)识别和(2)可视化输入设计空间中每个不同的集群或感兴趣的区域。本文重点研究了该方法的可视化阶段。而不是选择一个单一的技术映射高维设计空间到低维,可视化的空间,选择过程进行了研究。度量标准可用于比较不同的可视化,但是当前的度量标准要么高估了质量,要么偏爱某些可视化的选择。因此,这项工作引入并验证了一个更客观的度量,称为保存,以比较不同的可视化策略的质量。此外,本文还介绍了一种新的可视化技术,即t-分布式邻居嵌入技术,并将其与其他可视化策略进行了比较。最后,将新的度量和可视化技术集成到一个两阶段的可视化策略中,以识别和可视化高维负刚度超材料设计问题的高性能设计簇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信