On the Identity of Problem Domain

Yingchun Tao
{"title":"On the Identity of Problem Domain","authors":"Yingchun Tao","doi":"10.33552/iojass.2023.01.000507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By analyzing some thoughts and viewpoints of scientific philosophers such as Popper, Lakatos, Kuhn, and Laudan, this paper thinks that abstract theory and concrete theory constitute the problem domain. Abstract theory evaluates the legitimacy of the problem, and concrete theory evaluates the difficulty degree of the problem. The comparison of the legal degree of the problem and the difficulty of the problem is only possible in the same problem domain. Popper believes that the problem domain is the same in practice. Lakatos, Kuhn, and Laudan do not fully agree with Popper’s views and give their solutions. Laudan’s scheme is relatively reasonable.","PeriodicalId":337343,"journal":{"name":"Iris Online Journal of Arts and Social Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iris Online Journal of Arts and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/iojass.2023.01.000507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By analyzing some thoughts and viewpoints of scientific philosophers such as Popper, Lakatos, Kuhn, and Laudan, this paper thinks that abstract theory and concrete theory constitute the problem domain. Abstract theory evaluates the legitimacy of the problem, and concrete theory evaluates the difficulty degree of the problem. The comparison of the legal degree of the problem and the difficulty of the problem is only possible in the same problem domain. Popper believes that the problem domain is the same in practice. Lakatos, Kuhn, and Laudan do not fully agree with Popper’s views and give their solutions. Laudan’s scheme is relatively reasonable.
论问题域的同一性
本文通过分析波普尔、拉卡托斯、库恩、劳丹等科学哲学家的一些思想和观点,认为抽象理论和具体理论构成了问题域。抽象理论评价问题的正当性,具体理论评价问题的难易程度。问题的法律程度和问题的难易程度的比较只有在同一个问题域才有可能。Popper认为问题域在实践中是相同的。拉卡托斯、库恩和劳丹并不完全同意波普尔的观点,并给出了自己的解决方案。劳丹的方案是比较合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信