A Framework for the Analysis of Security Technology Vulnerabilities: Defeat Evaluation of an Electronic Access Control Locking System

Michael Coole, Deborah Evans, D. Brooks
{"title":"A Framework for the Analysis of Security Technology Vulnerabilities: Defeat Evaluation of an Electronic Access Control Locking System","authors":"Michael Coole, Deborah Evans, D. Brooks","doi":"10.1109/ICCST52959.2022.9896573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Security literature has identified the need for product evaluation; however, there still exists limited published work in product testing and an absence of cross-disciplinary evaluation frameworks. Evaluation frameworks should consider both physical and technical vulnerabilities due to, in part, an increase in integration and connectivity of electronic security systems. Consequently, the study developed and applied a criterion-based Defeat Evaluation Framework in the evaluation of a security technology, specifically on an electronic access control locking system. The study found that the Defeat Evaluation Framework supported the identification of risks across commercial, performance and defeat categories, which included physical and technical vulnerabilities to defeat. Identification of such vulnerabilities enhances risk decision-making in the uptake of such security technologies.","PeriodicalId":364791,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","volume":"01 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCST52959.2022.9896573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Security literature has identified the need for product evaluation; however, there still exists limited published work in product testing and an absence of cross-disciplinary evaluation frameworks. Evaluation frameworks should consider both physical and technical vulnerabilities due to, in part, an increase in integration and connectivity of electronic security systems. Consequently, the study developed and applied a criterion-based Defeat Evaluation Framework in the evaluation of a security technology, specifically on an electronic access control locking system. The study found that the Defeat Evaluation Framework supported the identification of risks across commercial, performance and defeat categories, which included physical and technical vulnerabilities to defeat. Identification of such vulnerabilities enhances risk decision-making in the uptake of such security technologies.
安全技术漏洞分析框架:电子门禁锁定系统失效评估
安全文献已经确定了产品评估的必要性;然而,在产品测试方面仍然存在有限的出版工作和缺乏跨学科评估框架。评估框架应考虑物理和技术漏洞,部分原因是电子安全系统的集成和连接性增加。因此,本研究开发并应用了基于准则的失效评估框架来评估安全技术,特别是电子门禁锁定系统。研究发现,失败评估框架支持识别商业、性能和失败类别的风险,其中包括物理和技术漏洞。识别此类漏洞可以增强采用此类安全技术时的风险决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信