The effect of locally based and imported lick stones on the growth and economic productivity of African dwarf sheep during the dry season in Benin

Faustin Dokui, S. Babatound, F. Houndonougbo, Fiacre Amoule, C. Chrysostome
{"title":"The effect of locally based and imported lick stones on the growth and economic productivity of African dwarf sheep during the dry season in Benin","authors":"Faustin Dokui, S. Babatound, F. Houndonougbo, Fiacre Amoule, C. Chrysostome","doi":"10.5455/vrn.2023.c24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to make and compare the effects and economic viability of lick stones based on local feedstuffs and imported ones. \nMaterials and Methods: Two-lick stones (minerals and multi-nutritional) based on local feedstuffs were made. An imported lick stone (ILS) was purchased at a local market. Four dietary treatments (the three different lick stones and a control group) were established, with six dwarf sheep receiving each treatment. The experiment was carried out over 90 days. Growth and economic parameters were calculated and compared. \nResults: The feed intake of sheep in the multi-nutritional lick stone group was better than that of the other groups. The feed conversion ratio was best for the lick stones made with local feedstuffs. The economic return (economic feed efficiency) was best for the mineral lick stone. For a unit of money invested in the feed supplements, the sheep fed with lick stone based on local feedstuffs have been allowed to gain 100.21 basic monetary unit of some West African countries more than the ones fed with imported feeds (p < 0.05). \nConclusion: It is not desirable to use ILS because the economic and growth performance of sheep fed with the ILS was even lower than that of the non-supplemented sheep.","PeriodicalId":185194,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Research Notes","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/vrn.2023.c24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to make and compare the effects and economic viability of lick stones based on local feedstuffs and imported ones. Materials and Methods: Two-lick stones (minerals and multi-nutritional) based on local feedstuffs were made. An imported lick stone (ILS) was purchased at a local market. Four dietary treatments (the three different lick stones and a control group) were established, with six dwarf sheep receiving each treatment. The experiment was carried out over 90 days. Growth and economic parameters were calculated and compared. Results: The feed intake of sheep in the multi-nutritional lick stone group was better than that of the other groups. The feed conversion ratio was best for the lick stones made with local feedstuffs. The economic return (economic feed efficiency) was best for the mineral lick stone. For a unit of money invested in the feed supplements, the sheep fed with lick stone based on local feedstuffs have been allowed to gain 100.21 basic monetary unit of some West African countries more than the ones fed with imported feeds (p < 0.05). Conclusion: It is not desirable to use ILS because the economic and growth performance of sheep fed with the ILS was even lower than that of the non-supplemented sheep.
本地和进口舔石对贝宁旱季非洲矮羊生长和经济生产力的影响
目的:比较国产饲料和进口饲料制作舔石的效果和经济可行性。材料与方法:以当地饲料为原料制备两舔石(矿物质和多种营养成分)。在本地市场购买了一块进口舔石。试验设4个饲粮处理(3种不同的舔石组和1个对照组),每个处理6只矮羊。实验进行了90多天。对增长和经济参数进行了计算和比较。结果:多营养舔石组绵羊采食量明显优于其他各组。以本地饲料为原料的舔砖饲料利用率最高。矿物舔石的经济效益(经济饲料效率)最好。在一些西非国家,以当地饲料为原料的舔石喂养的羊比以进口饲料喂养的羊多获得100.21个基本货币单位(p < 0.05)。结论:补饲ILS的羊的经济性能和生长性能甚至低于未补饲的羊,不宜补饲ILS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信