The influence of culture on the assessment of the importance of decision attributes; Germany versus the Netherlands

Hans Heerkens, C. Koster, J. Ulijn
{"title":"The influence of culture on the assessment of the importance of decision attributes; Germany versus the Netherlands","authors":"Hans Heerkens, C. Koster, J. Ulijn","doi":"10.1504/EJCCM.2010.037641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate whether cultural differences between Dutch and German individual actors lead to different ways of assessing the importance of decision attributes (which may or may not lead to different attribute weights). During think-aloud sessions, German and Dutch students performed an importance assessment task: establishing the weights of the attributes 'safety' and 'passenger comfort' for a company in the process of buying a fleet of minibuses. A model for analysing the importance assessment process; the weight assessment model or WAM, was used to identify similarities and differences between Germans and Dutch. The unexpected conclusion was that the Dutch showed more attention to detail than the Germans (who were less 'grundlich'), but that the German were not sloppier but more efficient. Germans needed less effort to fulfil the assignment. The working rules (heuristics) used by the Germans differed from those used by the Dutch, despite the close proximity of the two populations and the possible influence of European integration. Suggestions are drawn up for German and Dutch actors involved in decision processes having to assess the importance of attributes together.","PeriodicalId":108773,"journal":{"name":"European J. of Cross-cultural Competence and Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European J. of Cross-cultural Competence and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/EJCCM.2010.037641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We investigate whether cultural differences between Dutch and German individual actors lead to different ways of assessing the importance of decision attributes (which may or may not lead to different attribute weights). During think-aloud sessions, German and Dutch students performed an importance assessment task: establishing the weights of the attributes 'safety' and 'passenger comfort' for a company in the process of buying a fleet of minibuses. A model for analysing the importance assessment process; the weight assessment model or WAM, was used to identify similarities and differences between Germans and Dutch. The unexpected conclusion was that the Dutch showed more attention to detail than the Germans (who were less 'grundlich'), but that the German were not sloppier but more efficient. Germans needed less effort to fulfil the assignment. The working rules (heuristics) used by the Germans differed from those used by the Dutch, despite the close proximity of the two populations and the possible influence of European integration. Suggestions are drawn up for German and Dutch actors involved in decision processes having to assess the importance of attributes together.
文化对决策属性重要性评价的影响德国对荷兰
我们调查了荷兰和德国个体行为者之间的文化差异是否会导致评估决策属性重要性的不同方式(这可能会或可能不会导致不同的属性权重)。在“大声思考”环节中,德国和荷兰的学生完成了一项重要的评估任务:为一家正在购买小巴车队的公司建立“安全”和“乘客舒适度”属性的权重。重要性评价过程分析模型体重评估模型(WAM)被用来识别德国人和荷兰人之间的异同。出乎意料的结论是,荷兰人比德国人更注重细节(德国人不那么“格伦德里希”),但德国人并不是马虎,而是效率更高。德国人完成任务所需的努力更少。德国人使用的工作规则(启发式)与荷兰人不同,尽管这两个民族距离很近,而且可能受到欧洲一体化的影响。为参与必须共同评估属性重要性的决策过程的德国和荷兰行动者提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信