Reliability-Test Planning Considering Multiple Failure Mechanisms and System Levels – an Approach for Identifying the Optimal System-Test Level, Type, and Configuration with Regard to Individual Cost and Time Constraints

A. Grundler, M. Dazer, B. Bertsche
{"title":"Reliability-Test Planning Considering Multiple Failure Mechanisms and System Levels – an Approach for Identifying the Optimal System-Test Level, Type, and Configuration with Regard to Individual Cost and Time Constraints","authors":"A. Grundler, M. Dazer, B. Bertsche","doi":"10.1109/RAMS48030.2020.9153678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To demonstrate the reliability of a product, engineers are forced to find the best feasible compromise between cost, time, and accuracy. In addition, the test configuration must be set according to the lowest possible resource requirements. The approach proposed in this paper utilizes the concept of probability of test success presented by Dazer et al. [1] to assess different test plans. In addition to the probability of test success, the test time and costs are used in the assessment. In order to obtain the distribution of the probability of test success, costs, and time, the different test types are simulated on the respective system levels using a Monte Carlo simulation. Two-parameter Weibull distributions of the failure mechanisms of the system serve as a prerequisite for the simulation. For real-world application, these can stem from similar products and applications, previous product generations, preliminary tests, expert knowledge, or even simulations. Based on these distributions, pseudo-random numbers of failure times are generated.","PeriodicalId":360096,"journal":{"name":"2020 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"1923 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS48030.2020.9153678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To demonstrate the reliability of a product, engineers are forced to find the best feasible compromise between cost, time, and accuracy. In addition, the test configuration must be set according to the lowest possible resource requirements. The approach proposed in this paper utilizes the concept of probability of test success presented by Dazer et al. [1] to assess different test plans. In addition to the probability of test success, the test time and costs are used in the assessment. In order to obtain the distribution of the probability of test success, costs, and time, the different test types are simulated on the respective system levels using a Monte Carlo simulation. Two-parameter Weibull distributions of the failure mechanisms of the system serve as a prerequisite for the simulation. For real-world application, these can stem from similar products and applications, previous product generations, preliminary tests, expert knowledge, or even simulations. Based on these distributions, pseudo-random numbers of failure times are generated.
考虑多种故障机制和系统级别的可靠性测试计划——一种确定考虑个人成本和时间约束的最佳系统测试级别、类型和配置的方法
为了证明产品的可靠性,工程师被迫在成本、时间和精度之间找到最佳可行的折衷方案。此外,测试配置必须根据尽可能低的资源需求进行设置。本文提出的方法利用Dazer等人[1]提出的测试成功概率的概念来评估不同的测试计划。除了测试成功的概率外,测试时间和成本也被用于评估。为了获得测试成功概率、成本和时间的分布,使用蒙特卡罗仿真在各自的系统级别上模拟了不同的测试类型。系统失效机制的双参数威布尔分布是进行仿真的前提。对于现实世界的应用程序,这些可能源于类似的产品和应用程序、以前的产品代、初步测试、专家知识,甚至模拟。基于这些分布,生成故障次数的伪随机数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信