Clinical Trial of a Probiotic and Herbal Supplement for Lung and Gut Health

N. Wenger, L. Qiao, T. Nicola, Z. Nizami, I. Martin, B. Halloran, K. Tanaka, M. Evans, X. Xu, T. Dinan, C. Kakilla, G. Dunngalvin, N. Ambalavanan, K. Willis, A. Gaggar, C. Lal
{"title":"Clinical Trial of a Probiotic and Herbal Supplement for Lung and Gut Health","authors":"N. Wenger, L. Qiao, T. Nicola, Z. Nizami, I. Martin, B. Halloran, K. Tanaka, M. Evans, X. Xu, T. Dinan, C. Kakilla, G. Dunngalvin, N. Ambalavanan, K. Willis, A. Gaggar, C. Lal","doi":"10.1101/2023.01.24.23284954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale: Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome may augment lung disease via the gut-lung axis. Proteobacteria may increase MMP-9 release and contribute to tissue proteolysis followed by neutrophil recruitment, lung tissue injury, and perpetuation of chronic lung disease. Trial Design: We sought to determine if a probiotic and herbal blend was safe and well-tolerated in healthy volunteers and asthmatic patients. Methods: We conducted a 1-month randomized, open-label clinical trial in Cork, Ireland with healthy and asthmatic patients who took the blend twice a day. The primary endpoint was safety with secondary endpoints including quality of life, lung function, gut microbiome ecology, and inflammatory biomarkers. Results: All subjects tolerated the blend without adverse events. Asthmatic subjects who took the blend showed significant improvements in lung function and serum short chain fatty acid levels from baseline to Week 4. The gut microbiome of asthmatic subjects differed significantly from controls, with the most prominent difference in the relative abundance of the proteobacteria Escherichia coli. Administration of the probiotic maintained overall microbial community architecture with the only significant difference being an increase in absolute abundance of the probiotic strains measured by strain-specific PCR. Conclusions: This study supports the safety and efficacy potential of oral probiotic administration of the probiotic and herbal to act on the gut-lung axis.","PeriodicalId":297069,"journal":{"name":"A31. GLOBAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES IN ASTHMA","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A31. GLOBAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES IN ASTHMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.24.23284954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome may augment lung disease via the gut-lung axis. Proteobacteria may increase MMP-9 release and contribute to tissue proteolysis followed by neutrophil recruitment, lung tissue injury, and perpetuation of chronic lung disease. Trial Design: We sought to determine if a probiotic and herbal blend was safe and well-tolerated in healthy volunteers and asthmatic patients. Methods: We conducted a 1-month randomized, open-label clinical trial in Cork, Ireland with healthy and asthmatic patients who took the blend twice a day. The primary endpoint was safety with secondary endpoints including quality of life, lung function, gut microbiome ecology, and inflammatory biomarkers. Results: All subjects tolerated the blend without adverse events. Asthmatic subjects who took the blend showed significant improvements in lung function and serum short chain fatty acid levels from baseline to Week 4. The gut microbiome of asthmatic subjects differed significantly from controls, with the most prominent difference in the relative abundance of the proteobacteria Escherichia coli. Administration of the probiotic maintained overall microbial community architecture with the only significant difference being an increase in absolute abundance of the probiotic strains measured by strain-specific PCR. Conclusions: This study supports the safety and efficacy potential of oral probiotic administration of the probiotic and herbal to act on the gut-lung axis.
肺和肠道健康益生菌和草药补充剂的临床试验
理由:肠道菌群失调可能通过肠-肺轴增加肺部疾病。变形菌可能增加MMP-9的释放,促进组织蛋白水解,随后中性粒细胞募集,肺组织损伤和慢性肺病的持续存在。试验设计:我们试图确定益生菌和草药混合物在健康志愿者和哮喘患者中是否安全且耐受性良好。方法:我们在爱尔兰科克进行了一项为期1个月的随机,开放标签临床试验,健康和哮喘患者每天服用两次混合物。主要终点是安全性,次要终点包括生活质量、肺功能、肠道微生物群生态和炎症生物标志物。结果:所有受试者耐受该混合物,无不良事件。从基线到第4周,哮喘受试者的肺功能和血清短链脂肪酸水平均有显著改善。哮喘患者的肠道微生物群与对照组有显著差异,其中最显著的差异是大肠杆菌的相对丰度。益生菌的施用维持了整体微生物群落结构,唯一显著的区别是菌株特异性PCR测量的益生菌菌株的绝对丰度增加。结论:本研究支持口服益生菌和草药对肠-肺轴作用的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信