Adaptive random prioritization for interaction test suites

Rubing Huang, Jinfu Chen, Zhicheng Li, Rongcun Wang, Yansheng Lu
{"title":"Adaptive random prioritization for interaction test suites","authors":"Rubing Huang, Jinfu Chen, Zhicheng Li, Rongcun Wang, Yansheng Lu","doi":"10.1145/2554850.2554854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Combinatorial interaction testing (CIT), a black-box testing method, has been well studied in recent years. It aims at constructing an effective interaction test suites, so as to identify the faults that are caused by interactions among parameters. After interaction test suites are generated by CIT, the execution order of test cases in the test suite becomes critical due to limited testing resources. To determine test case order, the prioritization of interaction test suites has been employed. As we know, random prioritization (RP) of test cases has been considered as simple but ineffective. Existing research unveils that adaptive random prioritization (ARP) of test cases is an alternative and promising candidate that may replace RP. However, previous ARP techniques may not be used to prioritize interaction test suites due to the lack of source-code-related information in interaction test suite, such as statement coverage, function coverage, or branch coverage. In this paper, we not only propose the ARP strategy in order to prioritize interaction test suites by using interaction coverage information, without the source-code-related information, but also unify the RP strategy and traditional interaction-coverage based prioritization strategy (ICBP). Additionally, simulation studies indicate that the ARP strategy performs better than the RP strategy, test-case-generation prioritization, and reverse test-case-generation prioritization, and can also be more time-saving than ICBP while greatly maintaining similar, or even better, effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":285655,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2554850.2554854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Combinatorial interaction testing (CIT), a black-box testing method, has been well studied in recent years. It aims at constructing an effective interaction test suites, so as to identify the faults that are caused by interactions among parameters. After interaction test suites are generated by CIT, the execution order of test cases in the test suite becomes critical due to limited testing resources. To determine test case order, the prioritization of interaction test suites has been employed. As we know, random prioritization (RP) of test cases has been considered as simple but ineffective. Existing research unveils that adaptive random prioritization (ARP) of test cases is an alternative and promising candidate that may replace RP. However, previous ARP techniques may not be used to prioritize interaction test suites due to the lack of source-code-related information in interaction test suite, such as statement coverage, function coverage, or branch coverage. In this paper, we not only propose the ARP strategy in order to prioritize interaction test suites by using interaction coverage information, without the source-code-related information, but also unify the RP strategy and traditional interaction-coverage based prioritization strategy (ICBP). Additionally, simulation studies indicate that the ARP strategy performs better than the RP strategy, test-case-generation prioritization, and reverse test-case-generation prioritization, and can also be more time-saving than ICBP while greatly maintaining similar, or even better, effectiveness.
交互测试套件的自适应随机优先级
组合交互测试(CIT)作为一种黑盒测试方法,近年来得到了广泛的研究。它旨在构建一个有效的交互测试套件,以识别由参数之间的交互引起的故障。在CIT生成交互测试套件之后,由于测试资源有限,测试套件中测试用例的执行顺序变得至关重要。为了确定测试用例顺序,使用了交互测试套件的优先级。正如我们所知,测试用例的随机优先级(RP)被认为是简单但无效的。现有的研究表明,测试用例的自适应随机优先化(ARP)是一种替代RP的有前途的候选方法。然而,由于交互测试套件中缺乏与源代码相关的信息,例如语句覆盖、功能覆盖或分支覆盖,以前的ARP技术可能无法用于对交互测试套件进行优先级排序。在本文中,我们不仅提出了基于交互覆盖信息的ARP策略,在不考虑源代码相关信息的情况下,利用交互覆盖信息对交互测试套件进行优先级排序,而且将RP策略与传统的基于交互覆盖的优先级排序策略(ICBP)统一起来。此外,仿真研究表明,ARP策略的性能优于RP策略、测试用例生成优先级和反向测试用例生成优先级,并且可以比ICBP更节省时间,同时大大保持相似甚至更好的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信